Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, SaghalienGriffiths, Arthur
History
Russian Prisons: St. Peter and St. Paul; the Schlüsselburg; the Ostrog at Omsk; the story of Siberian exile; Tiumen, Tomsk, Saghalien
Griffiths, Arthur
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia -- History; Prisons -- Russia -- History
The indictment against the Czar and his government for their brutal
defiance of the commonest rules of humanity has been more than
substantiated by the deplorable facts set forth in the previous pages.
It is agreeable to note some disposition to mend matters on the part of
the supreme authorities. Certain reforms in prison administration have
been introduced in recent years, showing that the autocrat of all the
Russias has not continued utterly indifferent to the sufferings of
Siberian exiles and convicts. Widespread radical changes have been
impossible; the evils were too deep seated and too extensive for general
removal; but one or two new prisons have been erected, more in accord
with the dictates of penitentiary science and aiming at partial
improvement. A brief account of one or two of these may serve to relieve
somewhat the gloomy picture which has been by no means over-coloured.
The Czars Alexander II and III could not plead ignorance of the horrible
conditions prevailing in Eastern Siberia which were brought unmistakably
to their notice by the reports of Anuchin in 1880 and 1882. Some of his
condemnatory remarks have already been quoted and may be repeated here
as summing up his final verdict. After minute inquiry and much
investigation, he characterises the Siberian prisons as follows: “The
exile system and penal servitude in Eastern Siberia are in the most
unsatisfactory state ... while the exile bureaus in the provinces are
not organised in a manner commensurate with the importance of the work
that they have to do and are prejudicial rather than useful to the
service.” The Czar Alexander III was so deeply impressed with the
necessity for reform that he endorsed on this report in his own
handwriting, “I should greatly like to do this and it seems to me
indispensable.” Events proved too strong however even for the autocrat
ruler of all the Russias. He says: “I have read this report with great
interest, and I am more than troubled by this melancholy but just
description of the government’s forgetfulness of a country so rich and
so necessary to Russia.” On the part dealing with prisons the Czar
endorsed the words, “A melancholy but not a new picture.” On a later
page I shall go further into the ameliorations and improvements
attempted since 1886.
CHAPTER VII
VAGABONDAGE AND UNIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account