S. Hurok Presents; A Memoir of the Dance WorldHurok, Sol
History
S. Hurok Presents; A Memoir of the Dance World
Hurok, Sol
Ballet -- History
In 1933, there was no ballet audience. It was something that had to be
created and developed through every medium possible. I had a two-fold
responsibility--because I loved ballet with a love that amounted to a
passion, and because I had a tremendous financial burden which I carried
single-handed, without the aid of any Maecenas; I had to make ballet
successful; in doing so, willy-nilly I had the responsibility of forming
a taste where no aesthetic existed.
For two decades I have had criticism levelled at me from certain places,
criticism directed chiefly at my policies in ballet; I have been
criticized for my insistence on certain types of ballets in the
repertoires of the companies I have managed, and for my belief in
adaptations and varying applications of what is known as the “star”
system. The only possible answer is that I have been proven right. No
other system has succeeded in bringing people to ballet or in bringing
ballet to the people.
It will not be out of place at this time to note the repertoire of the
de Basil company at the time of the breakdown of the relations between
Massine and de Basil, which may be said to be the period of the Massine
artistic direction and influence on the de Basil companies, from 1933 to
1937.
There were, if my computation is correct, and I have checked the matter
with some care, a total of forty works, with thirty-four of them
actively in the repertoire. Of these, there were two sound classics
stemming from the Imperial Russian Ballet, creations by Marius Petipa
and Lev Ivanoff: _Swan Lake_, in the one-act abbreviation; and _Aurora’s
Wedding_, the last _divertissement_ act of _The Sleeping Beauty_ or _The
Sleeping Princess_, both, of course, to the music of Tchaikowsky. There
were three Russian works, i.e., ballets on Russian subjects:
Stravinsky’s _Petroushka_; the _Polovtsian Dances from Prince Igor_; and
_Le Coq d’Or_, a purely balletic and entertaining spectacle, with the
Rimsky-Korsakoff music rearranged for ballet by Tcherepnine. All of the
foregoing were by Michel Fokine. Eight other Fokine works were included,
all originally produced by him for Diaghileff: three, which might be
called exotic works--_Cléopâtre_, to the music of Arensky and others;
_Thamar_, to the music of Balakireff; and _Schéhérazade_, to the
Rimsky-Korsakoff tone-poem. Five ballets typifying the Romantic
Revolution: Stravinsky’s _Firebird_; _Carnaval_ and _Papillons_, both by
Robert Schumann; _Le Spectre de la Rose_, to the familiar Weber score;
that greatest of all romantic works, _Les Sylphides_, the Chopin
“romantic reverie.”
There were two works by George Balanchine: _Le Cotillon_ and _La
Concurrence_, the former to music by Chabrier, the latter to music by
Auric. A third Balanchine work, _Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme_, was
necessarily dropped from the repertoire because the costumes were
destroyed by fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account