Large ships had two decks, an upper one and a gun-deck underneath.
Towards the end of the sixteenth century, a third deck, called a
false orlop was laid in the hold to carry cabins and stores. The ship
was divided transversely on both upper and lower decks by means of
bulkheads where the forecastle and poop ended. Gravel ballast was
used to such an extent that but little room was left for stores. A
large portion of the space left in the hold of the ship in the waist
was taken up by the cooking-galley which was a solid structure of
bricks and mortar. Raleigh[77] complains of the heat “that comes from
the cook roome” as well of the risk of fire which it afforded, and
of the unsavoury smells which emanated from this part of the ship.
He therefore recommends that the “cook roomes” be placed in the
forecastle instead, as was the custom already adopted by many of the
merchant ships.
When Elizabeth came to the throne, the _Henri Grace à Dieu_ had
been accidentally burnt five years before. Apart from the _Jesus
of Lubeck_ (700 tons), the _Triumph_ was the largest English ship
afloat. Built in 1561, her tonnage was over a thousand, and her
crew numbered 500. Until the launching of the _Prince Royal_ in
1610, she was the finest English ship afloat. But though there were
improvements going on in regard to the building of the ships, the lot
of the sailor was not entirely a happy one. Musty rations, want of
clothes, and the harmful effects of the bilge water collecting in the
bottom of the ship and emitting an unwholesome stench, caused scurvy
and dysentery; and the sailors of both the English ships and the
Spanish Armada suffered terribly from these. But on the other hand,
we find that as early as the year 1601, Lancaster, during his first
voyage for the East India Company, kept the crew of his flagship in
comparatively good health by serving out lime-juice.[78]
[Illustration: FIG. 50. THE “ARK ROYAL,” ELIZABETH’S FLAGSHIP. BUILT
IN 1587.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account