Comparing a ship of the seventeenth century with a modern sailing
craft of the same tonnage, the most striking defects that would
appear in the former were the clumsiness in proportions. The
lowness of the bow and the height of the stern seem to us nowadays
ridiculous: so they were. But it was just one of the stages reached
in the transition from those lofty forecastles and stern-castles that
we saw originate in early times. But masts and spars were now no
longer the stumpy items they had been. There was an improvement, too,
in the existing rule of tonnage-measurement. Up to 1628 it had
been far from reliable, being reckoned by the capacity for storing
so many tuns of wine. From the time of Henry V. and long after,
ton as applied to shipping denoted the capacity to hold a barrel
measuring 42 cubic feet in the hold below deck. Therefore a vessel
of 900 tons was capable of holding 900 such barrels. As the barrels
were circular and could not be packed close together, the tonnage was
really greater than what was given.[97] But from 1628 it was to be
estimated from the length of the keel, leaving out the false post (a
piece bolted to the after edge of the main sternpost), the greatest
breadth within the plank, the depth from that breadth to the upper
edge of the keel, and then to multiply these and divide the result by
one hundred.[98]
We have seen how, in the sixteenth century, the greatest rivals of
the English were the Spaniards. Now, in the seventeenth century,
it was the Dutch. Gradually they had been getting stronger and
stronger until about the middle of the seventeenth century they had
reached their zenith in prosperity and power. They had accumulated
considerable wealth, were building fine, capable ships, and about the
time we are speaking of had no equals in either of these possessions.
Before the close of the sixteenth century we have seen them engaging
on the first Arctic Expedition and inventing a new rig for small
vessels. All through the reigns of James and Charles I. they had
gone on developing. It was not until about the close of Elizabeth’s
reign that Holland had commenced to build ships purely for fighting
purposes, but by the year 1624 their men-of-war were the superior of
ours. They kept their ships well, and we find incidentally that it
was the practice of the Dutchmen to tallow the bottom of their ships
while the English had allowed their vessels to become overgrown with
weeds and barnacles below the water-line. The competition between
the two countries set ablaze so much jealousy that an explosion was
bound to come sooner or later. It did come during the Commonwealth,
but though the Civil Wars of Charles I. had the same ill effects on
our Navy as the Wars of the Roses, yet under Blake the Dutch were
beaten, our Navy became again the finest in the world, and settled
for the future the position which English fleets should occupy in
respect of other nations. Highly ruinous as this war was to Dutch
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account