Sanitation -- Cuba -- Havana; Sanitation -- Panama; Yellow fever -- Cuba -- Havana
All the work at Havana was done by men trained and instructed as to
the life habits of the mosquito, and the same was the case for the
first three years at Panama, when the effective mosquito work was
done. Whenever speaking or writing on this subject I have insisted
upon the necessity of having the execution of the work in the hands
of men who have been trained in anti-malarial procedure.
Another duty of the inspector was to see that the houses were
properly screened, and that the screens were kept in effective
condition. The Commission had several thousand buildings scattered in
thirty or more towns, and it endeavored to keep all these buildings
mosquito-proof with wire netting. Mr. Wright, the architect of the
Commission, developed several very useful types of houses, well
adapted to a tropical country and for the use of wire netting. The
general plan was not to attempt to screen the doors and windows; such
screening is more or less imperfect, and with several entrances to a
house, it is impossible with any ordinary care to prevent the doors
being left open. Mr. Wright therefore planned his houses so that they
were screened in, having only one door of entrance. A house screened
in this way is very thoroughly protected against the mosquito. The
housekeeper, with very little attention, can keep closed the one
screen door that gives entrance to the house.
Another great advantage of such screening is that there is very
little interference with the circulation of the air. We used a
wire netting of sixteen strands to the inch. In the case of a
window screened with such wire, a large part of the air that would
ordinarily enter is kept out, and the interior of the house is made
hot and uncomfortable in a warm climate. With the whole side of the
veranda screened the amount of air kept out is not appreciable, and
at Panama there was no complaint that the screening interfered with
the ventilation.
Another very great advantage of this style of building was that the
galleries could be used as living- and sleeping-rooms, and this at
Panama was very generally the case. It was found that the cost of
screening the gallery was very little more than that of screening the
doors and windows. While screening the whole gallery required much
more wire netting, the work itself was very simple. Making the window
and door frames brought up the cost of screening them to about the
cost of screening the galleries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account