Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globeBourke, John Gregory
Religion
Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globe
Bourke, John Gregory
Scatology
“En outre, chaque fille publique qui se livre à quelque homme que ce
soit, lorsqu’elle entre pour la première fois dans la ville de Montlucon,
doit payer sur le pont de cette ville quatre deniers, ou y faire un
pet.”—(Dulaure, “des Divin. Générat.” p. 279, quoting from Ducange,
“Glossarium,” article “Bombus.”)
In a work by the Abbé Roubaud, entitled “La Pétérade, poême en quatre
chants,” we are informed, “Il renvoie à Ducange pour prouver qu’en France
on admettait les pets comme monnaie de cours en paiement des péages....
Bombi pro scudis valebant.”—(“Bib. Scatalogica,” p. 48.)
If we may believe Victor Hugo, the custom of the “péage” at the bridge
of Montluc was generally known to the people of France in the fifteenth
century. Thus, in the first chapter of “Notre Dame,” the populace of
Paris, at the Feast of Fools, are represented as indulging in much
badinage,—
“Dr. Claude Choart, are you seeking Marie la Giffards?”
“She’s in the Rue de Glatigny.”
“She’s paying her four deniers,—quatuor denarios.”
“Aut unum bumbum.”
Dulaure again quotes Ducange in regard to the tolls demanded of public
women first crossing the bridge at Montluc. He finds description of
this peculiar toll in registers dating back to 1398; he also sees
the resemblance between this toll and the tenure of the Manor of
Essington.—(See “Traité des Dif. Cultes,” vol. ii. p. 315, footnote.)
Surgeon Robert M. O’Reilly, U. S. Army, states that among the Irish
settlers who came to the United States in the closing hours of the last
century the expression was common, in speaking of Flatulence, to term it
“Sir-Reverence.”
“Sir-Reverence. In old writers, a common corruption of ‘save reverence,’
or ‘saving your reverence,’—an apologetic phrase used when mentioning
anything deemed improper or unseemly, and especially a euphemism for
_stercus humanum_.” “‘Cagada,’ a surreverence.”—(Stevens’s “Sp. Dict.,”
1706.)
“Siege, stool, sir-reverence, excrement.”—(Bishop Wilkins’s “Essay
towards a Philosophical Language,” 1688, p. 241.)
“Thoo grins like a dog eating sir-reverence.” (Holderness, “Glossary,
English Dialect Society.”) Compare Spanish _salvanor_, anus.
(Stevens.)—(“Folk-Etymology,” Rev. A. Smith Palmer, London, 1882.)
THE SACRED CHARACTER OF BRIDGE-BUILDING.
It is quite within the bounds of argument and proof to show that the
Romans looked upon the building of a bridge as a sacred work. Upon no
other hypothesis can we make clear why their chief priest was designated
“the Greatest Bridge-Builder” (the Pontifex Maximus). That this idea was
transmitted to the barbarians who occupied Continental and insular Europe
would be a most plausible presumption, even were historical evidence
lacking.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account