Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globeBourke, John Gregory
Religion
Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globe
Bourke, John Gregory
Scatology
“In the collection entitled ‘Sylon, or the Wood’ (p. 130) we read that ‘a
few years ago, in this same village, the women in labor used to drinke
the urine of their husbands, who were all the while stationed, as I have
seen the cows in St. James’s Park, straining themselves to give as much
as they can.’”—(Brand, “Popular Antiquities,” London, 1849, vol. iii.
article, “Lady in the Straw.”)
“Mariti urina hausta partum difficilem facilitare dicitur.”—(Etmuller,
vol. ii. p. 265, Schroderi, “Dilucidati Zoölogia.”)
An instance of the drinking of her own urine by a pregnant woman is to be
read in Schurig (p. 45), art. “De Pica.”
The warm urine of the husband was drunk for the same purpose: “Scil.
Hartmannus commendat ut difficiliter pariens libat haustum urinæ mariti
sui et ita si hic fuerit genuinus fœtus parientam illam ex parti solvi
putat; ast si urinæ aliquid subest erit illud sali volatili ad morem
aliorum omnium volatilium, attribuendum.” (Etmuller, vol. ii. pp. 171,
172.) Here we have the husband’s urine employed not only as a medicine,
but as a test of the wife’s fidelity.
John Moncrief directs that, to facilitate conception, a pessary should
be inserted in the vagina, of which hare’s dung was to be a component.
Horse’s dung, drunk in water, aided a woman in childbirth.—(“The Poor
Man’s Physician,” Edinburgh, 1716, p. 149.)
“Ut mulier post partum in secundis non laboret, de lotio hominis
subtiliter gustet et secundæ statim sequentur.”—(Sextus Placitus.)
Dioscorides prescribed both human ordure and the dung of the vulture to
bring about the expulsion of the fœtus.—(Materia Medica, edition of Kuhn,
vol. i. p. 232 _et seq._)
Goose-dung, in internal doses, was prescribed by Pliny for the same
purpose.—(Lib. 30, c. 4.)
But the dung of the elephant or menstrual blood prevented conception,
according to Avicenna: “Impregnationem prohibent ... stercus elephantis,”
vol. i. p. 390, b 11; “Impregnationem prohibent ... sanguis menstruus, si
supponatus.”—(Vol. i. pp. 330, a 35, 388, b 50.)
For accidents to pregnant women, apply rabbit’s dung externally; for
miscarriages, man’s urine, internally; the excreta of lionesses, hawks,
and chickens, internally; of horses and geese, externally and also
internally; and of pigeons and cows, externally. For after-birth pains,
the patient’s own urine, externally; or the excrement of chickens,
internally.—(Paullini.)
Schurig recommended the use of lion-dung, internally, in cases of
difficult parturition.—(“Chylologia,” p. 819.)
Etmuller says of secundines: “In partu difficili nil est præstantius” (p.
270).
Both Pliny and Hippocrates recommend hawk-dung in the treatment of
sterility, and to aid in the expulsion of the fœtus in childbirth; it
was to be drunk in wine; their prescription is copied by Etmuller:
“Hippocrates et Plinius ad sterilitatem emendandam propinant.”—(vol. ii.
p. 285.)
For the expulsion of the dead fœtus, Pliny recommended a fumigation of
horse-dung.—(Lib. xxviii. c. 77.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account