Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globeBourke, John Gregory
Religion
Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globe
Bourke, John Gregory
Scatology
In the famous bull of Ernulphus, Bishop of Rochester, cited in “Tristram
Shandy,” the delinquent was to be cursed, “mingendo, cacando.”—(See
“Tristram Shandy,” Lawrence Sterne, ed. of London, 1873, vol. i. p. 188.)
“Fasting on bread and drinking water defiled by the excrement of a fowl”
are among the disciplinary punishments cited in Fosbroke’s “Monachism,”
London, 1817, p. 308, note.
This specimen of monastic discipline may be better understood when
read between the lines. The veneration surrounding chicken-dung in the
religious system of the Celts, prior to the introduction of the Christian
religion, could be uprooted in no more complete manner than by making
its use a matter of scorn and contempt; history is replete with examples
wherein we are taught that the things which are held most sacred in one
cult are the very ones upon which the fury and scorn of the superseding
cultus are wreaked. On this point read the notes taken from the pamphlet
of Mr. James Mooney, in regard to the superstitions attaching to the uses
of chicken-dung among the Irish peasantry.
“I have mentioned the sacrifice of cocks by Kelts; it was, and still
is, all over Asia, the cheap, common, and very venial substitute for
man.”—(“Rivers of Life,” Forlong, London, 1883, vol. ii. p. 274.)
We may reasonably infer that the dung of chickens as used by the Irish is
a representative of, and a substitute for, human ordure.
The Easter season which has preserved and transmitted to our times
so many pagan usages, has among its superstitions one to the effect
that “every person must have some part of his dress new on Easter day,
or he will have no good fortune that year. Another saying is that
unless that condition be fulfilled, the birds are likely to spoil your
clothes.”—(Brand, “Pop. Antiq.” vol. i. p. 165, art. “Easter Day.”)
The Kalmucks believe in many places of future punishment, one of
them being “un de ces séjours est couvert d’une nuée d’ordures et de
vidanges.” (Pallas, Paris, 1793, vol. i. p. 552.) This is the belief
inculcated by their Lamas.
At the Lithuanian festival called “Sabarios,” fowls were killed
and eaten. “The bones were then given to the dog to eat; if he did
not eat them all up, the remains were buried under the dung in the
cattle-stall.”—(“The Golden Bough,” vol. ii. p. 70.)
In cases of sickness “the inhabitants of a village are forbidden to wash
themselves for a number of days, ... and to clean their chamber-pots
before sun-rise.”—(“The Central Eskimo,” Dr. Franz Boas, in Sixth An.
Rep. Bur. of Ethnol. Wash. D. C. 1888, p. 593.)
“We have seen that in modern Europe, the person who cuts or binds or
threshes the last sheaf is often exposed to rough treatment at the hands
of his fellow-laborers. For example, he is bound up in the last sheaf and
thus encased is carried or carted about, beaten, drenched with water,
thrown on a dunghill, etc.”—(“The Golden Bough,” i. 367.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account