Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globeBourke, John Gregory
Religion
Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globe
Bourke, John Gregory
Scatology
The rare and erudite pamphlet of Samuel Augustus Flemming, “De Remediis
ex Corpore Humano desumtis,” Erfurt, 1738, although containing not more
than thirty-two pages, is filled with a mass of curious information upon
subjects generally disregarded. Flemming remarks that those who could
use urine, calculi, and things of that kind in medical practice, should
not shrink from the employment of ordure as well. “And it is truly
wonderful,” he says, “that a substance, the very aspect and odor of which
are sufficient to induce an inevitable nausea, should be regarded not
merely as a matter of curiosity and study, but held in the highest repute
as a unique and most precious treasure for the preservation of health.”
Yet Paracelsus, and others of his school, knowing the natural repugnance
to the acceptance of such medicines, prepared it under the name of
“Zibethum Occidentalis,” and administered it in doses of from one to two
drams, given in honey or wine, to ward off attacks of fever; by others,
it was employed as a plaster in cases of throat-inflammation, being then
called “Aureum.” Others again were of the opinion, from an examination
of its chemical nature, that it was fairly entitled to a place in the
Materia Medica. An oil and water were distilled from it, and used in
ocular sores, corrosive ulcers, and all sorts of fistulas; for affections
of the scalp, for the ulcers of erysipelas, for ring-worm and tetter, and
especially the pains of gout. Finally, it was believed by many to be of
exceptional efficacy in the cure of the plague, being taken internally.
“Qui urina, calculi et aliis delectantur, non a stercore ipso
abhorrebunt,” etc. The full citation in Latin need not be repeated, as it
is expressed in much the same manner as the views of Schurig, Paullini,
Etmuller, Beckherius, and others on the same subject. He cites Zacutus
Lusitanus Poterus and Johannes Anglicanus, neither of whose writings are
to be found in America.
Speaking of human urine, Flemming says that physicians boasted not only
of their ability to diagnose disease from urine, but to use the fluid
itself in the treatment of disease. It was employed in two ways: either
in the raw state, as emitted from the person in due course of nature, or
in chemical preparations extracted from it. It was often administered
with beneficial results in dropsy as an enema. In difficult labor, a
draught of the husband’s urine taken warm brought easy and safe delivery.
A drink of the patient’s own urine was highly commended in hysteria. As
an external application for the eradication of dandruff, scab, and other
scalp troubles, it was held in high esteem among the common people.
A salt and a spirit were prepared from urine by distillation, and
highly spoken of in the treatment of frenzy, mania, and kindred mental
infirmities of a grave type.
Flemming quotes from Beckherius, whose writings have already been
presented, and from Quercetanus, in “Pharmac. dogmat.,” p. 119.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account