Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globeBourke, John Gregory
Religion
Scatalogic Rites of All Nations: A dissertation upon the employment of excrementitious remedial agents in religion, therapeutics, divination, witchcraft, love-philters, etc., in all parts of the globe
Bourke, John Gregory
Scatology
Very frequently the excrement is first reduced to ashes. The monks of
Chivem, called Pandarones, smear their faces, breasts, and arms with the
ashes of cow dung; they run through the streets demanding alms, very much
as the Zuñi actors demanded a feast, and chant the praises of Chivem,
while they carry a bundle of peacock feathers in the hand, and wear the
_lingam_ at the neck.[33]
COW DUNG ALSO USED BY THE ISRAELITES.
“The tribes had not many feelings in common when they came to be writers
and told us what they thought of each other. As a rule, they bitterly
reviled each other’s gods and temples.... Judeans called the Samaritan
temple, where calves and bulls were holy, in a word of Greek derivation,
‘Pelethos Naos,’ ‘the dung-hill temple.’ ... The Samaritans, in return,
called the temple of Jerusalem ‘the house of dung.’”—(“Rivers of Life,”
Forlong, vol. i. p. 162.)
Commentators would be justified in believing that these terms preserve
the fact of there having been in these places of worship the same
veneration for dung that is to be found to this day among the peoples of
the East Indies.
In another place Dulaure calls attention to the similar use among the
Hebrews of the ashes of the dung of the red heifer as an expiatory
sacrifice.[34]
In one of the Hindu fasts the devotee adopts these disgusting excreta as
his food. On the fourth day, “his disgusting beverage is the urine of
the cow; the fifth, the excrement of that holy animal is his allotted
food.”—(Maurice, “Indian Antiquities,” London, 1800, vol. v. p. 222.)
“I do not think that you can lay weight on the fact that in Israel, when
a victim was entirely burned, the dung was not exempted from the fire.
I think this only means that the victim was not cleared of offal, as in
sacrifices that were eaten.”—(Personal letter from Prof. W. Robertson
Smith, Christ College, Cambridge, England.)
“Refert etiam Waltherus Schulzius (“Oest-Indianische Reise,” lib. 3,
cap. 10, 1, m. 188, seq.) certam Indorum sectam Gioghi dictam nullum
assumere cibum, nisi fimo vaccino coctum; capillos et faciem Croco et
Stercore vaccino inungunt; nemo etiam in hanc societatem admittitur
nisi antea per longum temporis spatium Corpus suum hoc stercore
nutriverit, etc.”—(Schurig, “Chylologia,” p. 783, quoted in “Bibliotheca
Scatalogica,” pp. 93-96.)
Etmuller, “Opera Omnia,” Commentar. Ludovic., Lyons, 1690, vol. ii.
pp. 171, 172, says that the Benjani, an Oriental sect, believers in the
Transmigration of Souls, save the dung of their cows, gathering it up in
their hands.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account