Religious disputations -- Fiction; Short stories, Australian
"Oh, Monsieur, man is a naturally moral being, just as he is a naturally
curious and scientific being. To him both curiosity and morality are
natural needs, and because they are needs they are truths. It is
impossible to consider a world which does not act according to a law of
virtue, just as it is impossible to consider a world which does not act
in accordance with the law of gravitation, or, better still, as an
example, a species which has not developed in accordance with the law of
evolution; and just as the scientist finds behind all the fleeting
appearances and phenomena of the world a basis in matter, so, behind all
the phenomena and fleeting appearances of virtue we find a basis in God,
And just as an individual is governed by his conscience in regulating
his actions, so humanity as a whole regulates its actions by an appeal
to some abstract idea of right. Such dramatic crises as the Revolution,
and the establishment of the Roman Empire, seem equally the result of a
certain slow consciousness working toward perfection; or take the growth
of Christianity, which began obscurely and with a literally subterranean
movement, is it not an instance of this blind working toward the light.
One cannot outrage the collective conscience of mankind with impunity. A
sudden outburst of popular resentment like the Revolution, which had
been incubating for at least a century, cannot be considered as a mere
caprice; can, indeed, only be considered as a revelation of justice.
Such outbursts have a purely negative effect upon human progress;
progress is the development of a new spirit, not the destruction of an
old constitution."
"You offer no constructive policy, beyond the creation of a new spirit.
Socialism, at least, pretends to one."
"Socialism is a reactionary force," answered Renan; "and all reactions
are bound to be more constructive than a progressive force. Their
natural tendency, as I have already said, is to crystallise in a
definite form. The spirit of progress is, on the contrary, an intangible
if all-pervading thing. It develops spontaneously in a thousand ways,
and as it pushes towards the unknown it is impossible for us to predict
with any certainty what forms it may assume. Being purely experience,
and not a creed, it is liable to be extensively modified or even
completely changed by some unforeseen development in any of its parts; a
discovery in any branch of science may react upon all, as the progress
of palæontology reacted upon history. That is the reason progress seems
always to be a purely destructive force. It is only after it has
escaped, through imperceptible degrees, into a more or less clearly
defined new phase, that we can gauge its value as a constructive force
in the last."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account