Religious disputations -- Fiction; Short stories, Australian
"It may be," he answered, "as you say, that mankind does not progress,
but merely revolves. Sometimes I have thought so. But nothing is
repeated in precisely the same way. Neither an individual, nor a
society, is what it imagines itself to be, in its action upon the world.
The Church, as it is considered by its adherents, is something totally
different from the Church as it seems to its directors. Every
individual, and every age, examines the gospels in a different light and
from a different standpoint, just as they examine the movement of the
planets, the structure of the earth, the conception of kingship, of the
State, even of that most immediate object the body. The life of St
Francis seems to spring quite naturally out of the mediæval world, with
its crude cosmogony, its notion of the universe as a huge mechanical toy
in the hands of God. To such people the story of Joshua commanding the
sun was not childish; miracles quite as wonderful were part of their
daily lives; and the world for them acted not according to fixed
immutable laws, but by the direct interposition of a Providence
susceptible to the prayers of man. To us it is different. We cannot
imagine a St Francis appearing in the modern world. The Church, Your
Holiness, cannot control the new movement, which will either transform
or destroy it; but in what will you suffer it to be transformed?
"The evil of infallibility is that it cannot retract, or confess to
error. The Pope has been endowed with this fatal gift of infallibility,
a personal charisma, and through it he has become an incarnation of the
Divine Wisdom, even as the Dalai Lama becomes an incarnation of the
Buddha. To the historian, the heretical Pope Honorius, condemned equally
by Councils, and by his successors, is sufficient to disprove your
claims. But the Church can triumph over facts of history. What it cannot
triumph over is the spirit of the age. You have a large body of
adherents, who describe themselves as Catholic without knowing what the
term implies. You have a smaller, body, whose principal business in life
seems to lie in reconciling, by innumerable sophistries and subterfuges,
your dogmas with the modern world. The smallest body of all is made up
of those of your adherents, who accept you as the sole fount of truth.
But in each of these three sections there is not a solitary individual
who accepts your teaching without colouring it with his own ideas. Each
will explain a dogma from the point of view of his own prejudices, and
only accepts it with a kind of mental reservation. Of course it always
has been so. Your peril lies in the rapid exchange of ideas which
characterises modern life, the ease of communication, and the lack of
any effective machinery for preventing their diffusion. The moment any
crisis arises you cease to act as a solid body; and the action of your
leaders has far less influence upon public opinion than the action of
your laity excusing, or justifying, or explaining, the multitudinous
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account