Religious disputations -- Fiction; Short stories, Australian
conversation both the _sal nigrum_ of Momus, and the _sal candidum_
which Mercurius gave.
"At first, seeing the ingenious and subtle mind of my friend, I was at a
loss to account for his apparent failure in assuring his own fortune;
but, knowing him better, I see that his judgment, never at fault in
dealing with things afar off, may be perplexed and misled when it comes
to bear upon present affairs; being so great in himself he doth
sometimes forget of what poor account in Europe are his countrymen
to-day. He is at present making a series of discourses upon politics,
which he reads in the gardens of Cosimo Rucellai, where the meetings of
the Academy are held. It was at one of these meetings, after the company
had dispersed, that I first had speech of him; in which traverses,
though the chief subject of his discourse is Livy's history of the Roman
Republic, he draweth his examples from many sources, and showeth how
mankind hath always been prone to the same faults, and in like
circumstances will always act in a like manner without regard for the
lessons and warnings of the past.
"In the intervals of preparing these discourses against their occasions,
and of refining those which he hath read, he giveth much time and labour
to the polishing of a little treatise or manual for princes; a work full
of seasonable matter, which I have read with much profit and agreement,
for he reasons not, as the schoolmen use, from some abstract theory of
the universe, with which all events must be forced into harmony, but
gathering together the facts of common experience, he derives from the
perfect understanding of them the principles of his philosophy;
wherefore I say that he hath invented a new science, and added a tenth
muse to the choir of Apollo. And to show you the satiric nature of the
man, I must tell you, that having dedicated his treatise of _The Prince_
to Lorenzo di Piero de' Medici, in the hope of some advancement and
reward, and being disappointed of this hope, in the dedication of his
_Discourses_ to Zanobi Buondelmonte and Cosimo Rucellai he says, 'Though
I have been mistaken on many occasion, yet certainly I have made no
error in offering my _Discourses_ to you. For in this I think to have
shown some gratitude for benefits received, and to have abandoned the
path habitually trodden by those who make a trade of writing, and whose
custom it is to dedicate their works to some prince, to whom, in the
blindness of their ambition or of their avarice, and in the pouring out
of their empty flatteries, they attribute all the virtues, instead of
making him blush for his vices. To avoid falling into that vulgar fault
I have made choice, not indeed of a prince, but of those who merit to be
princes.... Moreover, historians give greater praise to Hieron, a plain
citizen of Syracuse, than to Perseus, King of Macedonia, for Hieron
lacked none of the qualities of kingliness, except the name, while
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account