School educationMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
School education
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Education -- Curricula; Education -- Philosophy
=The Children’s Magna Carta.=—My plea is, and I think I have justified
it by experience, that many doors shall be opened to boys and girls
until they are at least twelve or fourteen, and always the doors of good
houses, (‘Education,’ says Taine, ‘is but a card of invitation to noble
and privileged salons’); that they shall be introduced to no subject
whatever through compendiums, abstracts, or selections; that the young
people shall learn what history is, what literature is, what life is,
from the living books of those who know. I know it can be done, because
it is being done on a considerable scale.
If conviction has indeed reached us, the Magna Carta of children’s
intellectual liberty is before us. The need is immediate, the means are
evident. This, at least, I think we ought to claim, that, up to the age
of twelve, all boys and girls shall be educated on some such curriculum,
with some such _habit_ of _Books_ as we have been considering.[24]
Appendices
APPENDIX I
_Questions for the Use of Readers_[25]
CHAPTER I
DOCILITY AND AUTHORITY IN THE HOME AND SCHOOL
1. In what points are there better relations between children and their
elders than there were a generation or two ago?
2. Characterise the elder generation of parents.
3. What of ‘ill-guided’ homes?
4. Give an example of martinet rule. Name some notable men who grew up
under such rule.
5. Compare the arbitrary parent now with the arbitrary parent of the past.
6. Was arbitrary rule a failure?
7. What thought should encourage our own efforts?
8. Show that arbitrariness arose from limitations.
9. That it is one cause of the reticence of children.
10. In what way has the direction of philosophic thought altered the
relations of parents and children?
11. What effect has the doctrine of the ‘Infallible Reason’ upon
authority?
12. Show that English thought again proclaims the apotheosis of Reason.
13. What is the final justification of the idea of authority?
14. Why is the enthronement of the human reason the dethronement of the
highest authority?
15. Show that the spread of an idea is ‘quick as thought.’
16. Why has the notion of the finality of human reason become intolerable?
17. On what grounds would you say that authority and docility are
fundamental principles?
18. Show that self-interest does not account for the response of docility
to authority.
19. Show that the work of the rationalistic philosophers was necessary.
20. Show that they hold a brief for human freedom.
21. Describe the way in which the education of the world seems to be
carried on.
22. Show the danger of the notion that authority is vested in persons.
23. Show that a person in authority is under authority.
CHAPTER II
DOCILITY AND AUTHORITY IN THE HOME AND SCHOOL
_Part II.—How Authority Behaves_
1. Show, by example, that it is easy to go wrong on principle.
2. Distinguish between authority and autocracy.
3. How does autocracy behave?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account