Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
History
Schools of Hellas: An Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 B. C.
Freeman, Kenneth J. (Kenneth John)
Education, Greek
More often secondary education was imparted, not in the regular
schools by regular, established masters, but by the wandering savants,
who taught every conceivable subject, and were all grouped together
under the general name of Sophists.[498] From this category the
mathematicians and astronomers, who in all respects occupied the same
position, are often excluded. This is due to the authority of Plato,
who, while detesting the other subjects taught as secondary education,
had a great affection for mathematics and astronomy, the only subjects
which he prescribes for lads in the _Republic_ and _Laws_. But
Aristophanes, taking a more logical position, includes geometry and
astronomy among the subjects taught by the burlesque Sophists of the
_Clouds_. In point of fact, secondary education included any subject
that the lad or his parents desired; and the wandering professors who
imparted it, and even established teachers like Isokrates, who kept
permanent secondary schools at Athens, were all alike, in the popular
view, Sophists.
But the more important subjects do naturally fall into two great
groups, Mathematics and Rhetoric. Mathematics, as may be seen from the
_Republic_, meant, as a part of secondary education, the Science of
Numbers, Geometry, and Astronomy, with a certain amount of the theory
of Music, which, owing partly to Pythagorean traditions, was classed
with mathematics. We have already seen a class learning Astronomy.
Plato, in the _Theaitetos_,[499] supplies a sketch of a lesson in more
advanced arithmetic, which, by Hellenic custom, was usually expressed
in geometrical terms in order to obtain the assistance of a diagram.
The lad Theaitetos says to Sokrates that Theodorus of Kurene, the
great contemporary mathematician, had been teaching him. “He was
giving us a lesson in Roots, with diagrams, showing us that the root
of 3 and the root of 5 did not admit of linear measurement by the foot
(that is, were not rational). He took each root separately up to 17.
There, as it happened, he stopped. So the other pupil and I
determined, since the roots were apparently infinite in number, to try
to find a single name which would embrace all these roots.
“We divided all number into two parts. The number which has a square
root we likened to the geometrical square, and called ‘square and
equilateral’ (_e.g._ 4, 9, 16). The intermediate numbers, such as 3
and 5 and the rest which have no square root, but are made up of
unequal factors, we likened to the rectangle with unequal sides, and
called rectangular numbers.” And so on. As the pupils apply the same
principle to cubes and cube roots, Theodorus must have initiated them
into the mysteries of solid geometry also.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account