India -- Description and travel; Missionaries -- India -- Biography; Missions -- India; Swartz, Christian Frederick, 1726-1798
The reference here to the reception a convert would be likely to
receive from the Christian people, by which they meant the Europeans,
reveals the religious conditions existing in the time of Schwartz. At
no period in the history of Christian missions in India had the cause
of Christ received any considerable approval from the representatives
of the civil power. In the early days of the Company no impediment was
placed in the way of preaching the glad tidings of Christianity, but
the ruling classes had studiously avoided any interference with the
superstitious and religious customs of the natives. Meanwhile in the
region of the Carnatic these idolatries were on the decline and we have
seen how readily the message of the missionaries was received, even by
the Brahmins. Probably such a scene as we have just considered in the
preaching of Schwartz has not its parallel even in modern missions.
But when the debate in the British Parliament raised the religious
question on the renewal of the Company’s charter in 1793 quite another
spirit was made manifest. A jealous fear of weakening our hold on
India by disturbing the religious predilections of the natives became
a scare and a hindrance, which has taken many years to overcome. The
opinion which created this difficulty was very clearly stated by Mr.
Fisher, an English chaplain, to the effect that “even amongst many of
the most enlightened British officials in the country there could be no
more dangerous means of estranging the hearts of the people from the
Government and no surer way of endangering the stability of the English
rule than by attempting to meddle with the religious concerns of the
Hindus, however prudently and carefully one might set to work. All
were convinced that rebellion, civil war, and universal unrest would
certainly accompany every attempt to promote missionary enterprise,
and above all that the conversion of a high caste native soldier would
inevitably mean the disbanding of the army and the overthrow of British
rule in India.” This false position soon began to bear its natural
fruit; if these idolatries were to be considered and protected it might
perhaps be a paying policy to patronize them. Therefore we read: “The
civil and military servants of the Company were compelled to present
offerings with their own hands to idols and to fire salutes in their
honour; and Christian Englishmen, whose religious scruples caused them
to shrink from these unhallowed compliances, had no alternative but to
relinquish their appointments.” The converts had now to contend with a
new difficulty which ought never to have been put in their way by the
power which emanated from the country from which Christianity came.
They not only had to face the separation and hostility of their former
relations and friends but the English boycotted them, and heathens and
Mohammedans were preferred before them for employment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account