Science and Medieval Thought: The Harveian Oration Delivered Before the Royal College of Physicians, October 18, 1900Allbutt, T. Clifford (Thomas Clifford)
Philosophy
Science and Medieval Thought: The Harveian Oration Delivered Before the Royal College of Physicians, October 18, 1900
Allbutt, T. Clifford (Thomas Clifford)
Philosophy, Medieval
[49] The “Arabs” were a mixed throng of orientals; some of them were
Aryans, as the Persians and Nestorians; some were Arabs, Syrians, or
Hebrews. The Nestorians were eminent as physicians, and it is
interesting to this College to know that one of the best translators
of Aristotle into Arabic was Johannitius, a Nestorian physician. The
Eastern peoples, as the Western, owed all to the Greeks except a
double measure of dialectical ingenuity, which was their own, and is
their own to-day. By the incisive methods of Aristotle the Christian
neo-platonists had been variously carved into heretics—such as the
Monophysites; and these when driven eastwards carried Greek to Edessa
and Bagdad: from these centres it was, and from Nisibur in Persia and
elsewhere, that the “Saracens” drew their culture. Aristotle was first
translated into Arabic in the reign of Al Mansur, the son of Harûn al
Raschid (813-833); Avicenna carried the Aristotelian encyclopedia to
its culmination; and Cordova in the tenth century was as full of
fervid disciples as was Paris in the thirteenth. The Arabian medicine
was Aristotle and Galen. The Arabian philosophy was originally built
upon the Alexandrian emanations and hypostases (the soul of the
universe, intelligence the first of creatures, nature and mutability,
and so forth). Essences and forms were produced, as the
“intelligibilia” of “real” knowledge, till, as some one has wittily
put it, “universals became almost palpable.” Avicenna indeed
approached understanding from the senses, and Averroes accepted this
right position; but he taught the permanent subsistence of
intelligence, as a sphere in a hierarchy of spiritual principles
independent of matter and persons. In no long time this was turned
into the unity, as opposed to the individuality, of the soul; the
universal soul dipping as it were into the individual, and at his
death returning into the universal; a virtual denial of personal
immortality. Hence the bitter defiance of Albert and St Thomas. The
Averroistic doctrines were enthusiastically propagated on the other
hand by that “malleus Ecclesiae Romanae” Frederick the Second
(1212-1250). The Arabian science consisted in medicine, mathematics,
astronomy, and alchemy. Averroes it was who first asserted the
independence of the spheres of science and religion; a division
popular at the present day, and one which lent itself to many a
convenient subterfuge, in Padua.
[50] Dante, Inf. (XX. 115). Michael Scot translated Averroes from
Arabian to Latin; also the _De cælo_ and _De anima_ of Aristotle,
which reached Roger Bacon about 1230. Thus we may regard Michael as
the founder of Paduan Averroism. All persons who busied themselves
with natural experiment in the Middle Ages were accused of magic; even
Albert did not escape the suspicion or the credit of sorcery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account