Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 312, December 24, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The importance of this subject to the United States, where the
consumption of sugar is increasing out of ratio to the production of
sugar-bearing plants, and where agricultural independence should be
realized, as we have already attained and maintained political
independence, and almost independence in manufacturing industries, has
called out Mr. Lewis S. Ware, a member of the American Chemical
Society, etc., in a pamphlet of over 60 pages, entitled a "_Study of
the Various Sources of Sugar_."
From this publication it appears that the main source of sugar supply
must still be _sucrose_, cane sugar, even in spite of the best efforts
of the general government and of the State agricultural organizations
to introduce sugar-bearing plants that will thrive in the temperate
and colder latitudes of this country. With the single exception of the
sugar beet, he seems to disparage all attempts to produce practical
sugar from hardy plants, or those that will mature in the region of
frosts in winter. Even sorghum, that has for twenty years held a place
in the hopes of the northern farmer, has declined so that the alleged
production of half a million pounds in 1866 had became barely a
twelfth of a million pounds in 1877.
In his remarks on the synopsis of one hundred and eleven experiments,
made at Washington, he says: "As may be noticed, thirty-five of them
(111) would yield zero. If we take the average of the hundred and
eleven experiments, we find as a yield 4.5 per cent., which result
cannot possibly be practically accepted. In other words, our
government, notwithstanding the favorable conditions under which they
were made, prove that the sorghum utilization is fallacy in every
sense of the word." ... "If sorghum is to be grown for its sirup, or
for fodder, it will evidently render excellent service." It seems that
less than four per cent. of crystallizable sugar in the sorghum juice
will not pay the cost of making sugar from it, as it will not
crystallize in a reasonable time, on account of the glucose in the
juice, which, with the other impurities, will prevent the ready
crystallization of four or five times their own weight of sucrose.
From the early history of sorghum, it appears that it was known as
_sorgo_ in the sixteenth century, while twenty or thirty varieties
were known under different names in Egypt, Arabia, and Africa. Some of
the names are, Chinese sugar cane, (sorgo), India cane, emphee or
Coffers' bread, paindes anges, etc.
The later history of it shows that in 1850, Count Montigny sent the
first samples from China to Europe. It had been used in the former
country for thousands of years for the manufacture of red dye. The
seeds were afterward sold in France for a _franc_ each.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account