Scientific American Supplement, No. 417, December 29, 1883Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 417, December 29, 1883
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Now, supposing we make another experiment with the test tube, and
instead of boiling we add to its contents a few drops of carbolic acid;
we find that decomposition is prevented almost as effectually as by the
use of the cotton wool. There are many other substances which act like
carbolic acid, and they are known by the common name of antiseptics or
antiseptic agents. They all act in the same way; and in such cases as
the dressing of wounds it is more easy to use this method of excluding
bacteria than by the exclusion of the air or by the use of cotton wool.
We have here another object for inquiry--viz., the particular property
of these different antiseptics, the property which they possess of
preventing decomposition. This knowledge is _very_ ancient indeed. We
have the best evidence in the skill of the Egyptians in embalming the
dead. These substances are obtained from wood or coal, which once was
wood. Those woods which do not contain some antiseptic substance, such
as a gum or a resin, will rot and decay. I am not sure that we can
give a satisfactory reason for this, but it is certain that all these
substances act as antiseptics by destroying the living organisms which
are the cause of putrefaction. Some are fragrant oils, as, for example,
clove, santal, and thyme; others are fragrant gums, such as gum bezoin
and myrrh. A large class are the various kinds of turpentine obtained
from pine trees. We obtain carbolic acid from the coal tar largely
produced in the manufacture of gas. Both wood tar, well known under the
name of creosote, and coal tar are powerful antiseptics. It is easy to
understand by what means meat and fish are preserved from decomposition
when they have been kept in the smoke of a wood fire. The smoke contains
creosote in the form of vapor, and the same effect is produced on the
meat or fish by the smoke as if they had been dipped in a solution of
tar--with this difference, that they are dried by the smoke, whereas
moisture favors decomposition very greatly.
I can show why a fire from which there is much smoke is better than one
which burns with a clear flame, by a simple experiment. Here is a piece
of gum benzoin, the substance from which Friar's balsam is made. This
will burn, if we light it, just as tar burns, and without much smoke or
smell. If, instead of burning it, we put some on a spoon and heat it
gently, much more smoke is produced, and a fragrant scent is given off.
In the same way we can burn spirit of lavender or eau de Cologne, but we
get no scent from them in this way, for the burning destroys the scent.
This is a very important fact in the disinfection of the air. The less
the flame and the larger the quantity of smoke, the greater the effect
produced, so far as disinfection is concerned. As air is a vapor, we
must use our disinfectants in the form of vapor, so that the one may mix
with the other, just as when we are dealing with fluids we must use a
fluid disinfectant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account