Scientific American Supplement, No. 483, April 4, 1885Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 483, April 4, 1885
Various
Science -- Periodicals
* * * * *
THE TRUE CONSTANT OF GRAVITY.
Many of the readers of this journal may like to participate in the
discussion of the following proposition. The statement is this:
The space through which a body, near the surface of the earth, at mean
latitude, _in vacuo_, descends by virtue of the accelerating force of
gravity in 1/1000 of an hour is precisely 2,500 geometric inches = 100
geometric cubits = the side of a square geometric acre.
[The geometric inch is taken, in accordance with the view of Sir John
Herschel, at 1/1,000,000,000 of twice the polar axis of the earth, and
equals 1-1/1000 English inches very nearly.]
The strict decimal relation of the proposition is shown by the following
table. It has been tested by Clairaut's theorem, and by other existing
expressions, and has been found to agree, far within the probable limits
of errors in observation, with the most approved values of the constant.
In fact, it is contained in the existing expressions; but the _decimal_
relation does not appear unless we state the unit of linear measure as a
decimal of the earth's semi-polar axis, and, at the same time, divide the
circle, both for time and for general purposes, _geometrically, i.e._, by
strict decimalization upon the hour-angle. A mathematical reason
underlies the proposition.
Time in Acquired Squares Total Ratio of Descent in
Thousandths Velocity, of the Descent, Spaces, Each Successive
of an Hour. Cubits. Time. Cubits. Interval of Intervals,
Time. Cubits.
1 200 1 100 1 100
2 400 4 400 3 300
3 600 9 900 5 500
4 800 16 1,600 7 700
5 1,000 25 2,500 9 900
6 1,200 36 3,600 11 1,100
7 1,400 49 4,900 13 1,300
8 1,600 64 6,400 15 1,500
9 1,800 81 8,100 17 1,700
10 2,000 100 10,000 19 1,900
So that--
Cubits. Acre Sides.
In 1/10,000 of an hour, the total
descent = 1 = 1/100
In 1/1000 of an hour, the total descent = 100 = 1
In 1/100 of an hour, the total descent = 10,000 = 100
And so on, in strict _decimal_ relation with the earth's semi-polar axis.
A two-fold reason why the constant for latitude 45° is vastly better than
any other, is in its having this simple relation with the semi-axis, and
at the same time a less complex way of applying the correction for
latitude.
JACOB M. CLARK.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account