Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886
Various
Science -- Periodicals
If the image of an object as seen in the microscope appears to be
unusually distorted and indistinct toward the edge of the field, and
satisfactory definition is limited to a small portion of the center,
the cause is often attributed to the spherical aberration of the
objective, while really this phenomenon has nothing to do with that
optical defect of the objective, if any exists, but is caused by a
lack of optical symmetry. If a perfectly symmetrical microscope
objective could be constructed, then, with any good eye-piece, it
would make no difference to the definition of the object were it
placed either in the center or at the edge of the field, even if the
objective had considerable spherical aberration. But, unfortunately,
our most symmetrical objectives, the low powers, leave much to be
desired in this respect, while our wide angle, high powers are very
far from symmetrical perfection.
There are two causes of this defect in the latter objectives, one
being the extreme wideness of their angular apertures, and the other
the great difference in the distances of the object and the image from
the optical center of the objectives.
Another mistake is often made in regard to the cause of certain
prismatic colors that are sometimes, in a striking degree, produced by
otherwise good objectives. According to the nature of these colors,
whether yellow or blue, green or indigo, they are generally regarded
as evidences of either chromatic over or under correction of the
objective. Of course the presence of either of these defects is
certainly and correctly indicated by the appearance of one or the
other of the colors, under certain circumstances; but the simple
visibility of prismatic color is by no means a reliable indication of
over or under correction of color, and, indeed, to the honor of our
opticians, it may be stated that very few objectives are made that
cannot justly be called achromatic in the general sense of the term.
By far the most common causes of prismatic color, in otherwise
carefully constructed objectives, are the so-called chromatic
aberrations of second or higher order. Every achromatic lens which is,
as it should be, at its best at about two-thirds of its aperture, is
inside of this ring or zone, toward the center slightly under and
outside, toward the edge, slightly over corrected. This defect is the
greater, the less the difference of the dispersive powers of the two
glasses used in the construction of the lens, for a given proportion
of their refractive indexes, and therefore the degree of visibility of
the colors of the aberrations of the second order depends greatly on
the nature of the glass employed in the construction of the lens.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account