Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 561, October 2, 1886
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The carbon dioxide generator, A, was devised by us to take the place
of the ordinary generators, in which marble is used. We have found
that a submersion of twenty hours in boiling water does not suffice to
completely remove the air which, as is well known, is contained in
ordinary marble; hence some other substance must be employed as a
source of the gas. In the apparatus which we are about to describe,
the acid carbonate of sodium is used.
It consists of a long, narrow cylinder (450 x 60 mm.); a tightly
fitting rubber stopper, through which three tubes pass, as shown in
the figure; a small cylinder, F, containing mercury; and a sulphuric
acid reservoir, G.
The tube, _g_, is drawn out to a fine point at the end and curved, so
that the acid which is delivered into A falls upon and runs down the
outside of the tube. The tube, h, dips under the mercury in F. G and
_g_ are connected by means of a long piece of rubber tubing which is
supplied with a screw pinch cock.
The apparatus is made to give any required pressure by raising or
lowering G and F; but the elevation of G, as compared with that of F,
should always be such that the gas will force its way through h rather
than g. The upper part of the cylinder, F, is filled with cotton wool
to prevent loss of mercury by spattering.
The material placed in A consists of a saturated solution of acid
carbonate of sodium, to which an excess of the solid salt has been
added. The sulphuric acid is the ordinary dilute. The apparatus, if
properly regulated, serves its purpose very well. The principal
precaution to be observed in using it is to avoid a too sudden
relieving of the pressure, which would, of course, result in the
introduction of an unnecessarily large quantity of sulphuric acid into
A.
* * * * *
WATER OF CRYSTALLIZATION.
By W.W.J. NICOL, M.A., D.Sc.
When a hydrated salt is dissolved, does it retain its water of
crystallization, or does this latter cease to be distinguishable from
the solvent water? Both views have found advocates among chemists who
have looked at the question of solution, and both have been supported
by arguments more or less to the point. But among the possible means
of solving this question there is one which has entirely escaped the
notice of those interested in the subject. And those who hold that
water of crystallization exists in solution have been entirely
oblivious of the fact that, while they are ready to accept the results
of the modern science of thermo-chemistry, and to employ them to
support their views on hydration, yet these very results, if correct,
prove without a shadow of a doubt that water of crystallization does
not exist in solution.
The proof is so clear and self-evident when once one's attention is
directed to it, that, though I intend to develop it more fully on
another occasion, I feel that it is better to publish an outline of it
at once.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account