Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The young man was referred to me by his former medical attendant, March
16, 1883. His urine was found to be slightly but distinctly tinged with
blood, and contained some small clots as well as some pus and mucus. He
complained of exquisite pain on urination, increased at the close,
recurring every half hour. Through examination per rectum (_a posteriori_)
unusual tenderness was found. Distinct increase in the density and
thickness of the right inferior section of the bladder was recognized by
the bimanual touch; a catheter was introduced, and three ounces of bloody
urine removed. The bladder was then irrigated gently with a saturated
solution of boric acid until the fluid returned clear. The catheter was
then withdrawn, leaving about four ounces of the solution, of a
temperature of 80°, in the bladder, as a preparation for its examination
by the electro-cystoscope of Lister. The required current was furnished by
the small six-cell battery of the Galvano-Faradic Co. The cystoscope was
then introduced into the bladder, and the current turned on. The
illumination was complete. Through the slightly rosy medium the small
blood vessels in the bladder mucous membrane were distinctly seen. On the
right side a deep red, granular-looking mass, with a wavy outline, was
then distinctly observed, covering about one-fourth of the cystoscopic
field. This appearance was verified by Drs. Abbe, Bangs, and W. K.
Otis--the unanimous opinion being that it represented a papillomatous
growth, to some extent covered by coagulated blood. Two days later a
similar examination was made, under the influence of an anæsthetic, which
corroborated the previous observations in every particular. (See
illustration.)
[Illustration: DIAGRAM OF BLADDER, SHOWING LOCATION OF TUMOR
AND POSITION OF CYSTOSCOPE.]
Some small filaments were subsequently removed with the lithotrite, but on
microscopical examination nothing of diagnostic importance was discovered.
From lack of the capacity of the bladder, the field was necessarily
limited, nevertheless, a very excellent view of the tumor could be
obtained. This is shown in the illustration, from a sketch made at the
time of the first examination. It represents the position of the tumor and
cystoscope when the best view of it was obtained.
On the following Monday the patient entered St. Luke's Hospital, and was
operated upon by my associate, Dr. L. B. Bangs, Dr. Charles McBurney
assisting. The high operation was performed, and the bladder being
examined by means of an electric light, introduced through the suprapubic
incision, the diagnosis made by the cystoscope was verified in every
particular. The growth was then removed, as far as possible, with the
scissors, and the surface cauterized with the Paquelin cautery. At the
present writing the patient is going on toward a satisfactory recovery.
The pathological examination made by Dr. Frank Ferguson, pathologist of
St. Luke's Hospital, showed the neoplasm to be a simple papilloma.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account