Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
In 1886, H. J. Kolbe, in his "Ueber die Stellung von Platypsyllus im
System" (Berlin entom. Zeitsch., xxx., 1886, pp. 103-105), discusses the
subject, without any new evidence, however. He concludes that most of its
characteristics relate it to the Corrodentia, and particularly to the
sub-order Mallophaga, in which it has its closest kinship in Liotheidæ.
The remarkable tripartite mentum he thinks should not be compared with the
bipartite mentum of Leptinus, and calls attention to the fact that in
Ancistrona in Mallophaga it is also trilobed.
The above are the more important papers on the subject, though the insect
has been referred by other authors to both Neuroptera and Orthoptera.
CHARACTERS OF PLATYPSYLLUS.
[Illustration: LARVA OF PLATYPSYLLUS CASTORIS--DORSAL VIEW.]
[Illustration: PLATYPSYLLUS CASTORIS.]
Where the characters of the image have been so often described, it is
unnecessary to refer to them in detail, and I will only call attention to
the more striking structural features and to some omissions by, or
differences between, previous authors. A glance at the illustrations which
I have prepared will show the prevailing characteristics of this
interesting creature, its general ovoid and flattened form, and more
particularly the flattened semicircular head. Dorsally, we notice the
rather prominent occiput fringed behind with short and broad depressed
spines or teeth which form a sort of comb, the prothorax trapezoidal and
but very slightly curved, with side margins strongly grooved. There is a
very distinct scutellem, and the two elytra are rounded at the tip and
without venation. Hind wings and eyes are both wanting. The abdomen shows
five segments, each with a row of depressed bristles.
On the ventral surface we find among the more curious characteristics,
first the antennæ; these were originally described by Westwood as
three-jointed, the club being annulated. Le Conte could not distinctly
make out the number of annular joints upon this club, though he thought he
detected seven, which made nine joints to the whole antenna. The club is
received in the deep cup-shaped excavation of the second joint. Horn
thought he detected a division of the second joint, and resolved but six
segments in the club, making also nine joints to the whole antenna, but in
a somewhat different fashion from Le Conte. Westwood's figure shows eight
annuli to the club. He failed to find any trace of the mandibles, but Le
Conte described them as small, flat, subquadrate, with the inner side
deeply crenulate, and resembling those of _Corylophus_; the stipes well
developed, and biarticulate. Horn could not entirely make out the
mandibles as described by Le Conte, and rather concluded that what Le
Conte described is really one of the granules which occur behind the
labrum. He considered that the piece could hardly be even an aborted
mandible, because of its diminutive size.
[Illustration: YOUNG LARVA.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account