Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
I must admit that these results far exceeded my expectations, although
they only confirmed the figures claimed by the patentee; and there are
not wanting indications that, when worked on a large scale and
continuously, they might be even still further lowered, as it is
impossible to obtain the most economical results when making less than
10,000 cubic feet of the gas, as the proper temperature of the walls
of the generator are not obtained until after several makes; and it is
only after about 8,000 cubic feet of gas has been made that the best
conditions are fulfilled.
It will enable a sounder judgment to be formed of the working of the
process if the complete experimental figures for a make of gas be
taken.
COMPOSITION OF THE GAS.
Hydrogen. 46.75
Olefines. 7.59
Ethane. 6.82
Methane. 11.27
Carbon monoxide. 11.65
Carbon dioxide. 0.50
Oxygen. 0.17
Nitrogen. 8.25
-------
100.00
UNPURIFIED GAS CONTAINED
Carbon dioxide. 2.32 per cent.
Sulphureted hydrogen. 2.84 "
Total sulphur per 100 cu. ft. = 6.67
Ammonia. nil
Bisulphide of carbon. nil
Gas produced Naphtha used
Gals. Pts.
1st. Make. 3,600 cu. ft. 10 7
2d. " 2,800 " 7 6
3d. " 2,300 " 5 3
------ --- --
8,700 24 0
The last portion of the table shows the economy which arises as the
whole apparatus gets properly heated. Thus the first make used 3
gallons naphtha per 1,000 cubic feet, the second 2 gallons 6 pints per
1,000 cubic feet, and the third 2 gallons 4 pints per 1,000 cubic
feet, and it is, therefore, not unreasonable to suppose that in a
continuous make these figures could be kept up, if not actually
reduced still lower.
In introducing the oil it is not injected, but is simply allowed to
flow in by gravity, at a point about half way up the column of fuel,
the taps for its admission being placed at intervals around the
circumference of the generator, and oil at first begins to flow down
the inside wall of the generator, but being vaporized by the heat, the
vapor is borne up by the rush of steam and water gas, and is cracked
to a permanent gas in the upper layer of fuel. This I think is the
secret of not being able to use heavier grades of oil, these being
sufficiently non-volatile to trickle down the side into the fire box
at the bottom, and so to escape volatilization. I have tried to
steam-inject the oil, but have not found that it yields any better
results.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account