Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 794, March 21, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Moreover, we are now talking about the use of carbureted water gas as
an enricher of coal gas, and not as an illuminant to be consumed _per
se._ and we may calculate that it would be probably used to enrich a
16-candle coal gas up to 17.5 candle power. To do this 25 per cent. of
22 candle power carbureted water gas would have to be mixed with it,
and taking the percentage of carbon monoxide in London gas at 5 per
cent.--a very fair average figure--and 18 per cent. as the amount
present in the Van Steenbergh gas, we have 8.25 per cent. of carbon
monoxide in the gas as sent out--a percentage hardly exceeding that
which is found in the rich cannel gas supplied to such towns as
Glasgow, where I am not aware of an unusual number of deaths occurring
from carbon monoxide poisoning.
The carbureted water gas has a smell every bit as strong as coal gas,
and a leak would be detected with equal facility by the nose; and I
think you will agree with me that the cry raised against the use of
carbureted water gas, for this reason, is one of the same character
that hampered the introduction of coal gas itself at the commencement
of this century.
We must now turn to the chemical actions which are taking place in the
generator of the water gas plant, and these are more complex in the
case of the Van Steenbergh plant than in those of the Lowe type, and,
for that reason, yield a gas of more satisfactory composition.
Taking gas as made by the Lowe or Springer process, and contrasting it
with the Van Steenbergh gas, we are at once struck by several marked
differences.
In the first place the hydrogen is far higher and the marsh gas or
methane lower in the Van Steenbergh than in the Lowe process, this
being due to the sharper cracking that takes place in the short column
of cherry red coke, as compared with the lower temperature employed
for a longer space of time in the Lowe superheater. Next we notice a
difference of 10 per cent. in the carbon monoxide, which is greatly
reduced in the Steenbergh generator by the carbon monoxide and marsh
gas reacting on each other as they pass over the red hot surface of
coke with formation of acetylene, which adds to the illuminants, this
action also reducing the quantity of marsh gas present.
Lowe Van Steenbergh
gas. gas.
Hydrogen..................... 27.14 46.75
Marsh gas.................... 25.35 11.27
Carbon monoxide.............. 26.84 18.65
Illuminants.................. 14.63 7.59
Ethane....................... ---- 6.82
Carbon dioxide............... 3.02 0.50
Oxygen....................... 0.15 0.17
Nitrogen..................... 2.87 8.25
------ ------
100.00 100.00
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account