Scientific American, Vol. XXXIX.No. 6. [New Series.], August 10, 1878Various
Science
Scientific American, Vol. XXXIX.No. 6. [New Series.], August 10, 1878
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
The figure looks altogether too much like one form of Mr. Hughes'
microphone to allow of its use in an article intended to establish the
novelty of Mr. Hughes' discovery.
The omissions from the text are quite as significant. Under the first
cut used in _Engineering_, Mr. Prescott says: "In the latest form of
transmitter which Mr. Edison has introduced the vibrating diaphragm is
done away with altogether, it having been found that much better results
are obtained when a rigid plate of metal is substituted in its place....
The inflexible plate, of course, merely serves, in consequence of its
comparatively large area, to concentrate a considerable portion of the
sonorous waves upon the small carbon disk or button; a much greater
degree of pressure for any given effort of the speaker is thus brought
to bear on the disk than could be obtained if only its small surface
alone were used."
The _Engineering_ writer coolly suppresses this important statement. He
does worse: he puts in its place the false statement that "the essential
principle of Mr. Edison's transmitter consists in causing a diaphragm,
vibrating under the influence of sonorous vibrations, to vary the
pressure upon, and therefore the resistance of, a piece of carbon," and
so on.
A little further on, while repeating Mr. Edison's account of the
experiments which led to the abandonment of the vibrating diaphragm
(page 226 of Mr. Prescott's book), the _Engineering_ writer drops out
the following remark by Mr. Edison: "I discovered that my principle,
unlike all other acoustical devices for the transmission of speech, did
not require any vibration of the diaphragm--that, in fact, the sound
waves could be transformed into electrical pulsations without the
movement of any intervening mechanism."
Worse yet, in the very face of Mr. Edison's assertion to the
contrary--an assertion which he could not by any possibility have
overlooked--this most unscientific journalist says: "Mr. Edison finds it
necessary to insert a diaphragm in all forms of his apparatus, that
being the mechanical contrivance employed by which sonorous vibrations
are converted into variations of mechanical pressure, and by which
variations in the conductivity of the carbon or other material is
insured.... On the other hand, Mr. Hughes employs no diaphragm at all,
the sonorous vibrations in his apparatus acting directly upon the
conducting material or through whatever solid substance to which they
may be attached."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account