Scientific American, Vol. XXXIX.No. 6. [New Series.], August 10, 1878Various
Science
Scientific American, Vol. XXXIX.No. 6. [New Series.], August 10, 1878
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
At the annual meeting of the New England Association of Gas Engineers,
Mr. Thomas, of Williamsburg, made the following remarks on this subject:
"In my early experience with the Williamsburg Gaslight Company, with
which I became connected in the year 1854, I found pretty nearly all the
street mains that were laid were connected with cement joints. While
there is no doubt in my own mind that a joint can be made perfectly
tight with cement, I much prefer the lead joint. Another thing to be
taken into consideration to keep tight joints is that the mains should
be laid a sufficient depth under the surface to protect them from the
action of severe frosts. A great many of the mains were not more than 18
inches or 2 feet below the surface of the streets, and at this depth in
our climate it is a matter of impossibility to keep joints tight, as the
action of the frost in winter will displace the mains and cause the
joints to leak. From the bad manner in which our mains were laid, and
the cement joints leaking so much, we could not afford to turn gas on
during the day. Had we done so we should not have had any to supply the
city at night, and we were thus compelled to shut off the gas just as
soon as there was any apology for daylight, and keep it shut off as late
as possible in the evening.
"With the most careful working in this manner, for a period of nine or
twelve months, our losses from leakage amounted to about 52 to 55 per
cent of the gas manufactured. A great part of this loss was caused by
the cement joints leaking, and also a part due to the fact that the
mains were not at sufficient depth under the surface to protect them
from the action of the frost. As soon as we possibly could I went over
the whole of our mains (there was about 17 miles in all), stripping
them, cutting out the cement, and rejointing them with lead. In one
season we got the loss from leakage down to 20 per cent, and this with
the gas turned on during the 24 hours of the day.
"One great objection to cement joints is the rigidity of them; in cases
where pipes have been disturbed by other excavations and settled, I
found in all cases that the mains were broken. In a leading main from
our old works, with cement joints, the main, a 10-inch one, was broken
entirely off and fractured lengthwise besides, by the upheaval of the
ground from frost. In some of the same mains that we had rejointed with
lead the mains were drawn apart, drawing the lead out, but with very
little loss of gas, as the gasket being driven in tight prevented any
great leakage. In cases of this kind the lead was easily driven back,
and the joint made perfectly tight again. I have never in our city put
in any street mains that I have not used lead in the joints, and in
laying mains we always make them gas tight with the gasket used.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account