Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth centuryRobertson, Eben William
History
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century
Robertson, Eben William
Scotland -- History -- To 1603
Scotland in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries still retained many
of the features of a confederated rather than of a consolidated
kingdom, acknowledging indeed, even in the earlier portion of that
period, the rule of one reigning family, but scarcely recognising the
authority of the same laws and customs, or bound together by the ties
of kindred, origin, and language. Between Forth and Tweed lay Lothian,
bordering towards the western frontiers upon the Cumbrian principality
and Galloway; both the former provinces having been annexed to the
Scottish crown by a course of successful aggression, if not by actual
conquest, though Galloway was still rather a tributary dependency than
an integral portion of the kingdom. Lothian, apparently, preserved
the same laws that were in force throughout Saxon Northumbria before
the reign of Canute; whilst two centuries of the dominion of a
Scottish line of princes over Cumbria must have introduced a Scottish
proprietary very generally throughout the province, without effecting
any material alteration in laws and customs, which, based upon the
Celtic principle of government, differed probably little, if at all,
from the code then and long afterwards retained in Galloway.
Northward of the Scots-water two great divisions were recognised,
_Scotia_, or Scotland proper, and _Moravia_. The former embraced the
whole of the Lowland districts from the Spey to the Forth, extending
to the summit of the _Mounth_ or Grampian range; thus including the
earldoms of Mar, Buchan, and Angus, Fife, Atholl, Strathearn, and
Menteith, with Gowrie and Stormont, the Merns and other districts
retained more directly in the king’s hands; together with the whole
of “Scottish Argyle,” which, before the creation of the shire and
bishopric, was connected with Atholl and the Abbacy of Glendochart;
whilst Cantyre and Cowal depended upon the earldom of Menteith.
_Moravia_ was made up of the earldoms of Moray, forfeited in the
earlier portion of David’s reign; Caithness, which still included
Sutherland, then extending as far as Dingwall; and Ross, a sort of
debatable land between the _Gall-Gael_, _Oirir-Gael_, and ancient
Mormaors of Moray: with “Northern Argyle,” or that portion of the
territories of the _Oirir-Gael_ which reached, at this period, from
the northern boundaries of the modern county to the frontiers of
the _Gall-Gael_ in Sutherland.[270] Feudal tenure, in the later
Anglo-Norman acceptation of the word, was unknown throughout these
provinces at the accession of Alexander the First; though the earlier
system of government, once existing amongst a number of independent
tribes and confederacies, had long given place to the royal authority
wherever the rights of the crown--as was certainly the case in
_Scotia_--were thoroughly established. But though the principle of
the system was changed, the features remained very much the same; and
a nobility, owing their original appointment or confirmation to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account