Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth centuryRobertson, Eben William
History
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century
Robertson, Eben William
Scotland -- History -- To 1603
[158] In the beginning of the century Uchtred, the son of Waltheof,
seems to have married and put away his wives without the slightest
scruple, nor could bishop Ealdun procure a permanent husband for
his daughter Egfreda even by alienating the lands of his see in her
favour. Twice was she divorced in spite of her dowry, and neither the
bishop nor the chronicler who records these proceedings appear to have
regarded them as extraordinary. _Sim. Dun. Twysden_, p. 79.
[159] _Sim. Dun. de Gestis_ 1070. _Vit. St. Marg._ Edgar and his family
appear to have left Scotland in 1069, and to have returned thither in
the following year.
[160] Such appears to be the meaning of the expression of the
Chronicler, “he found nothing there for which he was the better,”
_Chron. Sax._ 1072. Compare _Wendover ad. an._ 1072.
[161] Edgar, according to the Chron. Sax., returned to Scotland from
Flanders in 1074, and he probably sought refuge in the latter country
at the approach of William.
[162] Lord Hailes, vol. 1, p. 17, thinks it improbable that Abernethy
on the Tay can be the place intended, from its lying out of William’s
probable route. He appears, however, to have forgotten that all the
early invaders of Scotland who combined a fleet with their land
force--and none else were successful--must have held their course
_along the coast_, or their fleet would have been useless. Abernethy,
according to Ailred, was _in Scotia_ (_Twysden_, p. 340), or beyond the
Forth, and it was exactly because William had succeeded in penetrating
into the heart of the real kingdom of Scotland that Malcolm came to
terms.
[163] _Chron. Sax._ 1072. _Sim. Dun. de Gestis_ 1072–1087. _An. Ult._
1072. It may be gathered from _Sim. Dun. de Gestis_ 1091, that Malcolm
held twelve manors of William and received a yearly payment of twelve
marks of gold, and as the kings only met once, these grants must have
been made on this occasion. The homage of Malcolm would appear to have
been _simple_ not _liege_, for he never seems to have been called upon
to perform any feudal service; whilst his subsequent repudiation of the
demands of Rufus shows that the homage was not rendered for the kingdom
of Scotland, but was simply the feudal recognition of his subsidy. In
short, the meeting appears to have resulted in a compromise, William
endeavouring to secure the peace of his northern borders by what in the
present age would take the form of a pension or subsidy, then conferred
as a feudal grant, for which Malcolm performed homage, giving up his
son as a hostage for his faithful observance of the treaty. _Vide
Appendix L_, part 2.
[164] _Sim. Dun. de Gestis_ 1072. _Malm. Gesta. Regum_, l. 3, sec. 253.
[165] _Sim. Dun. de Gestis_ 1073. _Chron. Sax._ 1074. _Malm. Gest.
Reg._, l. 3, sec. 251.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account