Scripture texts illustrated by general literatureJacox, Francis
Religion
Scripture texts illustrated by general literature
Jacox, Francis
Homiletical illustrations
“Asseveration blustering in your face
Makes contradiction such a hopeless case;
In every tale they tell, or false or true,
Well-known, or such as no man ever knew,
They fix attention, heedless of your pain,
With oaths like rivets forced into the brain;
And e’en when sober truth prevails throughout,
They swear it, till affirmance breeds a doubt.”
The imprecation of Corneille’s Dorante, _Que le foudre à vos yeux
m’écrase si je mens!_ only evokes from Clarice the contemptuous rebuff,
_Un menteur_ [which, and more than which, emphatically, Dorante is,
for he is _Le Menteur_,] _est toujours prodigue de serments_. So again
Racine’s Theseus: _Toujours les scélérats ont recours au parjure_,—when
Hippolytus begins to call heaven, and earth, and universal nature to
witness, etc. So, too, Chamont, in Otway’s tragedy: “When a man talks
of love, with caution trust him; but if he swears, he’ll certainly
deceive thee.” Indeed, as Owen Feltham has it, wherever there is too
much profession, there is cause for suspicion. “Reality cares not to be
tricked out with too taking an outside; and deceit, when she intends to
cozen, studies disguise. Least of all should we be taken with swearing
asseverations. Truth needs not the varnish of an oath to make her
plainness credited.” Fielding’s Pettifogger, on a certain occasion,
calling to mind that he had not been sworn, as he usually was, before he
gave his evidence, “now bound what he had declared with so many oaths
and imprecations, that the landlady’s ears were shocked, and she put a
stop to his swearing, by assuring him of her belief,” inconsiderately
enough, as the manner of the man might have proved. Scott’s Jorworth,
when heaping asseveration on asseveration, is cut short by the honest
Fleming he is striving to mislead: “Stop, good Jorworth; thou heapest
thine oaths too thickly on each other, for me to value them to the
right estimate; that which is so lightly pledged, is sometimes thought
not worth redeeming.” So again Monkbarns tells the gaberlunzie, after
hearing his story of the adept, “I am strongly disposed to believe that
you have spoken the truth, the rather, that you have not made any of
those obtestations of the superior powers, which I observe you and your
comrades always make use of when you mean to deceive folks.” The author
of “London Labour and the London Poor,” recounts the redundance of “Glory
be to God! it’s the thruth I’m telling of you, sir,” etc., etc.; which he
had to hear from Irish mendicity, or mendacity, or both. “The dignity of
truth is lost with much protesting,” the Cicero of Jonson’s “Catiline”
says.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account