Hyginus[302] mentions three facts in regard to the Mausoleum; he says
that it was of Parian marble, 80 feet in height, 1,350 feet in
circumference. In two of these statements he is certainly right. The
marble of the Mausoleum is Parian, and the circuit of the sacred
enclosure or peribolus is given by Newton as 1,348 English feet. But as
to the height of the building Hyginus contradicts Pliny, and must
probably be corrected by him.
Martial, in a curious line, speaks of the Mausoleum as suspended in the
air[303]. This phrase certainly implies that it did not appear to
spectators a solid and massive structure, but light and aspiring. Mr.
Oldfield contends that the phrase would well describe a building whereof
the upper part rested mainly on pillars[304], and would certainly not
apply to a building of which solidity is the most striking feature, as
it is of Mr. Pullan’s reconstruction.
The most important of ancient writers on the Mausoleum is Pliny[305],
whose description we must transcribe at length, both in Latin and
English.
Scopas habuit aemulos eadem aetate Bryaxim et Timotheum et
Leocharen, de quibus simul dicendum est quoniam pariter caelauere
Mausoleum. Sepulcrum hoc est ab uxore Artemisia factum Mausolo
Cariae regulo, qui obiit Olympiadis cvii[306] anno secundo. Opus id
ut esset inter septem miracula hi maxime fecere artifices. Patet ab
austro et septentrione sexagenos[307] ternos pedes, breuius a
frontibus, toto circumitu pedes ccccxi[308], attolitur in
altitudinem xxv cubitis, cingitur columnis xxxvi. Πτερόν
uocauere[309]. Ab oriente caelauit Scopas, a septentrione Bryaxis,
a meridie Timotheus, ab occasu Leochares, priusque quam peragerent
regina obiit. Non tamen recesserunt nisi absoluto iam, id gloriae
ipsorum artisque monumentum iudicantes, hodieque certant manus.
Accessit et quintus artifex. Namque supra πτερόν pyramis altitudine
inferiorem aequauit[310], uiginti quatuor gradibus in metae cacumen
se contrahens. In summo est quadriga marmorea quam fecit Pythis.
Haec adiecta cxxxx pedum altitudine totum opus includit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account