The terms "fine-grained," "coarse-grained," "straight-grained," and
"cross-grained" are frequently applied in the trade. In common usage,
wood is coarse-grained if its annual rings are wide; fine-grained if
they are narrow. In the finer wood industries a fine-grained wood is
capable of high polish, while a coarse-grained wood is not, so that in
this latter case the distinction depends chiefly on hardness, and in
the former on an accidental case of slow or rapid growth. Generally if
the direction of the wood fibres is parallel to the axis of the stem
or limb in which they occur, the wood is straight-grained; but in many
cases the course of the fibres is spiral or twisted around the tree
(as shown in Fig. 15), and sometimes commonly in the butts of gum and
cypress, the fibres of several layers are oblique in one direction,
and those of the next series of layers are oblique in the opposite
direction. (As shown in Fig. 16 the wood is cross or twisted grain.)
Wavy-grain in a tangential plane as seen on the radial section is
illustrated in Fig. 17, which represents an extreme case observed in
beech. This same form also occurs on the radial plane, causing the
tangential section to appear wavy or in transverse folds.
When wavy grain is fine (_i.e._, the folds or ridges small but
numerous) it gives rise to the "curly" structure frequently seen in
maple. Ordinarily, neither wavy, spiral, nor alternate grain is
visible on the cross-section; its existence often escapes the eye even
on smooth, longitudinal faces in the sawed material, so that the only
guide to their discovery lies in splitting the wood in two, in the two
normal plains.
[Illustration: Fig. 15. Spiral Grain. Season checks, after
removal of bark, indicate the direction of the fibres or
grain of the wood.]
[Illustration: Fig. 16. Alternating Spiral Grain in Cypress.
Side and end view of same piece. When the bark was at _o_,
the grain of this piece was straight. From that time, each
year it grew more oblique in one direction, reaching a climax
at _a_, and then turned back in the opposite direction. These
alternations were repeated periodically, the bark sharing in
these changes.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account