Second Shetland Truck System ReportGuthrie, William
History
Second Shetland Truck System Report
Guthrie, William
Labor law -- Truck system -- History -- England; Shetland (Scotland) -- History
2164. Do you sell bread?-I sell nothing except general drapery
stock, and the other articles I have mentioned. There is a Mr.
Laurence, a baker, and his sons are the firm of R. B. Laurence &
Co.
2165. Does Mr. Laurence buy hosiery?-Not so far as I am aware.
He was in business as a hosier some years ago but he is now only a
grocer and baker.
2166. Did you buy a shawl for 80s., about three months ago, from
a Mrs. Williamson who lives at the Asylum?-Not to my
recollection. If there is anything particular about the transaction,
that might enable me to remember it.
2167. You did not purchase such a shawl, and pay part of the price
in bread?-No; I could not have done that. I may mention that the
name of the firm of R. B. Laurence & Co. is generally pronounced
by the people here in the same way as my own, they speak of them
as Laurenson, although their names are Laurence.
2168. Have you sometimes paid large sums in cash for shawls?-
Very often, in separate transactions. I have frequently paid cash
down for particular shawls worth £2 or £2, 10s. I have given as
much as £5 in cash for a single shawl; but that, of course, was very
special article.
2169. Would you make any objection to paying so much in
cash?-No; but I would be pretty sure the article was worth it.
2170. In the case you have just now referred to, was it necessary
for the woman to make any particular representation as to her
wanting the cash before she could get it, or was she asked to take
the price in goods?-No; I did not ask her to do that. Probably
when she produced the article, she said she wished to sell it for
cash, and so the price was fixed.
2171. Does a demand of that kind for payment in cash affect the
price for the shawl?-Certainly. We could not give so much in
cash as we could give in goods; and if a cash tariff were adopted,
there would have to be a general deduction made all round-a
deduction equivalent to the ordinary retail profit in the drapery
trade.
2172. Do the sellers of these hosiery goods to you understand that
if they demand cash they must take a smaller price?-Yes, they
understand that; and they would be quite prepared to take it.
2173. Is it quite understood that there are two prices for these
articles-a cash price, and a price in goods?-Yes; I think that is
quite understood. Of course, if a woman comes in with a shawl
for which she is willing to take 20s. in goods, she would be equally
willing to take 16s. or 17s. in cash, because the difference between
the 16s. or 17s. in cash and the 20s. in goods represents the retail
draper's profit, which is supposed to run from 15 to 20 or 25 per
cent. on these articles. That is the case over all the kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account