Second Shetland Truck System ReportGuthrie, William
History
Second Shetland Truck System Report
Guthrie, William
Labor law -- Truck system -- History -- England; Shetland (Scotland) -- History
2418. Is there any one else you wish to mention?-There are many
cases in which I paid cash for hosiery articles, although I could not
name the persons just now. They were people whose faces I knew,
but I cannot recollect their names.
2419. Were these cases in which you paid the whole value in
cash?-Yes.
2420. Did these transactions enter your books?-No; the cash was
just paid for them at the time.
2421. Do you take no notice of the cash paid out in [Page 51] that
way?-Not generally. I don't that there is any special entry in the
cash-book showing what it had been paid for.
2422. Don't you take a receipt from such persons?-No, I never
did.
2423. Then how do you know the price at which to sell these
shawls?-Because I put the prices on the shawls myself.
2424. Do you mark them all at the time?-Yes.
2425. And you swear that no entry of such a payment enters into
any of your books?-I swear that, to my knowledge, there is no
memorandum taken of a cash transaction carried through in that
way. With regard Elizabeth Gifford, I may explain that I gave her
a receipt for a shawl to be paid for in cash, and she came to my
shop some time afterwards and got the cash.
2426. Then that cash entered your book?-Yes. Here is the entry
[produces line-book]: 'C. M. 95. 1. 11.71. Paid in cash, 80s. £4.'
2427. How do you know that is the transaction?-Because it is the
only transaction of the kind that is in the book, it is the only
transaction in which £4 was paid in cash.
2428. Was that entry all made at one time?-The first part of it
was made when she brought the shawl. The date when she got the
line is not here.
2429. Then it was on 1st November 1871 that she got the
money?-Yes.
2430. The entry made at first was 'C.M. 95. 80s. £4?'-Yes.
2431. And the figures '1. 11. 71,' and the words 'paid in cash,'
were inserted when the money was given?-Yes
2432. There is no entry of the date of the issuing of the line at
first?-No; the book was not being dated then.
2433. When did the book begin to be dated?-We have the date on
the line itself, and therefore it is quite sufficient to enter the
numbers of the lines in the book.
2434. But when did the book begin to be dated?-On 30th
October.
2435. Then it must have been a few days before 30th October
when the line was first given out?-Yes.
2436. To come back to Jemima Sandison's book the total amount
supplied to her was £3, 5s. 31/2d. in period of thirteen months, and
there was a balance of 16s. to begin with. The amount that
appears to have been paid in cash during that time is 3s. 6d. on all
these transaction: is that so?-It may be; but I have ready
explained that the entries in the book do not represent all the cash
which she got from me.
2437. She also appears to have got tea on thirty-seven different
occasions, in quantities of 8d., 9d., and 10d. worth at the time?-
Yes; that would be a quarter of a pound.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account