Second Shetland Truck System ReportGuthrie, William
History
Second Shetland Truck System Report
Guthrie, William
Labor law -- Truck system -- History -- England; Shetland (Scotland) -- History
2577. If a woman puts a higher price on her goods, is it not the
usual thing for a merchant to put a little additional on the price of
the goods which he is to give her in exchange?-I don't know
what other merchants do, but we never do it. Only the other day, a
woman carried out two shawls which I could have bought if I had
departed from our usual practice, but I thought they were priced
too high. I could have sold the shawls at 1s. or 2s. lower, but I
would not buy them these terms. We have one fixed price for cash
and goods. I am not aware whether the practice I have mentioned
exists now in the town; I don't think it does. When I commenced
business I made it a point fix my price in that way, and I have
always adhered that. I was told by some parties I would never do
business in that manner; but I had some faith in common sense,
and I hoped the people would come to see that they were as well
dealt with in taking the real cash value and getting the real cash
value; so that we never give a higher price than we consider the
thing is worth in the market, and we do not give lower.
2578. You say your understanding is, that goods are to be taken in
payment, but that cash is given to a small extent: do you not
consider that to be a departure from the understanding?-
Decidedly.
2579. You do that, as a favour to the knitter?-Yes; and I wish it
to be distinctly understood, that in every case when I give 1s. of
cash, I consider it is just 2d. out of my pocket.
2580. Would you not have that profit if the 1s. was spent in your
shop?-Yes.
2581. With regard to the lines or receipts which you issue, can you
say whether they are generally presented at your shop by the
parties to whom they were originally given out?-They are made
payable to the bearer, and they may not be presented by these
parties.
2582. But, in point of fact, are they generally presented by the
parties to whom they have been given out?-It is impossible to
know who they have been given out to, or who brings them back.
2583. Then what is the purpose of your keeping this register of
them?-It is a check upon the lines. If we had no check of that
kind, we would not know what lines were out.
2584. And you would not know what amount was lying out in that
way?-No; that is one reason for keeping it. Another thing is, that
if a line was lost, and its value paid to another person who had
found it, we could see by this book when it was paid.
2585. Could it show to whom it was paid?-No.
2586. I suppose the lines themselves are destroyed when they have
been settled for?-Yes.
2587. You have no means of telling from your books, whether they
have been presented by the original creditor in them, or by
another?-No.
2588. And you don't know about that from your own personal
knowledge?-As regards my own personal knowledge, I know
that, in the generality of cases, they are presented by the parties to
whom they have been given originally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account