Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
It is not necessary to recall the general disillusionment that came
about when President Wilson agreed to the policy of secrecy at the
peace conference. Undoubtedly this decision was based on the motive
to secure, with a promptness required by the stress of the times,
a settlement which would in general commend itself to the sense of
justice of the world, although it might necessarily contain details
which, if published by themselves, would cause lengthy public
discussion and delay the final solution. If such an expectation was
entertained, it was not as a matter of fact fulfilled in the results
of these secret consultations. The method adopted did not favor the
broad and permanent view, but rather the more shortsighted bargaining
in which the old diplomacy excels. In their solutions neither the
consultations of the peace conference, nor the subsequent diplomatic
negotiations among the Allies, got beyond the old methods of bartering
the destinies of small and weak peoples, which had been used by the
Congresses of Vienna and of Berlin with disastrous results. The various
conferences of 1919 to 1920 recorded a complete return to the system
of secret diplomacy, to such an extent that it appeared constantly as
if the plenipotentiaries feared to let their doings be known. Even when
there was no reason from any point of view for concealment, information
came out in a roundabout fashion which left the public mind confused;
as for instance in the giving out of a decision regarding the fate of
Constantinople, and in the reports concerning the text of President
Wilson’s Adriatic memorandum which were current before its publication.
From the entanglements of this procedure American diplomacy did not
keep itself free, nor did it, at this time, assist the world in finding
a more straightforward method more in accord with American political
experience.
The disadvantages of secret methods of transacting public business have
been brought home to the American people through several incidental
matters of no small importance. It evidently was the intention of
President Wilson to reserve American rights as to the Island of Yap
which is a vital link in the chain of cable communication between
America and the Far East, and a reservation of this kind is indicated
by references in the official minutes, though not by a written
protocol. Without the knowledge of the United States, the Council of
the League of Nations later disposed of the mandate for all of the
North Pacific Islands. As this action was secret, it could not be
known whether the American interest bearing on Yap Island had been
safeguarded or not. It was stated as late as January 26, 1921, that the
American Government was not in possession of the greater part of the
minutes of the Peace Conference. Notwithstanding the protests of the
United States, Japan based her claim to the North Pacific Islands on
the secret treaties made during the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account