Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
But we cannot believe that the peoples of the world will be so foolish
as to allow themselves to remain in this condition and not to find
their way to a reorganization of public affairs which will make such a
haphazard and perilous situation impossible. It seems plain that the
idea of the state and of state action will have to be transformed in
accordance with the greater self-consciousness of humanity which has
developed in the last century, or the desire to scrap the political
state and to find some more adequate and natural form of organization
will rapidly gain in strength. Meanwhile, there is a need of the
formation of a great freemasonry of all publicists, political men and
teachers of the people, united in the resolve to know and make known
the essential elements in current international affairs, to arouse the
public to a sense of the importance of these matters to their every-day
life, and to support the men more directly responsible for the conduct
of foreign policy, with an intelligent, searching, reasonable and broad
public opinion.
XIV
RECENT AMERICAN EXPERIENCE
Up until a recent date Americans could contemplate the play of secret
diplomacy in Europe and Asia with a feeling of entire aloofness,
as belonging to a political society which had neither need nor
inclination to utilize such methods. Our unmenaced continental
position, the natural protection and separation implied in distance
and ocean boundaries, and the conscious intention of keeping clear of
international entanglements, all contributed to make the foreign policy
of the United States entirely public and straightforward. The fathers
of the Constitution had established the sound principle that treaties
are the law of the land. This not only involves mature consideration of
a treaty before it is made, but publicity as well. The American people
have known at all times what obligations had been incurred, and the
world had the same information. There has been no room for guesswork
and suspicion.
The instructions which were issued to John Jay when he was sent as
special envoy to England in 1794 lay down the following rule of
conduct: “It is the President’s wish that the characteristics of an
American minister should be marked on the one hand by a firmness
against improper compliances, and on the other by sincerity, candor,
truth and prudence, and by a horror of finesse and chicane.” These
straightforward words began a tradition which has ever since animated
the American diplomatic service. When after the Spanish war, under
Secretary Hay, American diplomacy entered more fully into world-wide
problems than in any previous era, the expression “the new diplomacy”
was currently used in a laudatory sense to designate what Hay had
implied when in a public address he had declared the Golden Rule to
be the cardinal principle of American diplomacy--an ideal which makes
secrecy and intrigue unnecessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account