Secret Service Under PittFitz-Patrick, William J. (William John)
History
Secret Service Under Pitt
Fitz-Patrick, William J. (William John)
Ireland -- History -- 1760-1820; Pitt, William, 1759-1806; Secret service -- Ireland
I allude to the famous 'Father O'Leary,' who, according to Mr.
Froude, was a spy of Pitt's, systematically employed in betraying
the secrets which his sacred calling and influence as a trusted
patriot enabled him to become possessed of; and, with unparalleled
audacity and baseness, publicly receiving the encomiums of his most
distinguished contemporaries, such men as Grattan and Curran, for
virtues which he only assumed, and for talents which he so basely
prostituted! Is it possible that this man could have played such an
odious part? Do you consider, sir, that the evidence produced by
Mr. Froude in support of so terrible an accusation is sufficiently
conclusive; or, has that sensational writer in this, as perhaps in
other instances, accommodated his facts to his theories?[523] With
tantalising reticence Mr. Froude gives only a few meagre lines from
the correspondence in which he claims to have found the proofs of
O'Leary's guilt. The subject has been much discussed in Australia,
as no doubt it has in every country in which Irishmen are to be
found. You have yourself, in one of your ...[524] volumes, referred
to a mysterious connection between O'Leary and William Pitt. Was it
an honourable, or an infamous one?
May I ask you to favour me with your opinion upon it, judged by the
light of Mr. Froude's revelations? By kindly complying with my
request, you will oblige many anxious inquirers at the 'Antipodes.'
I am, Sir, etc.,
MORGAN MCMAHON.
W. J. Fitzpatrick, Esq.
I may at once say that, although evidence exists of O'Leary's frailty,
it is not sufficient to warrant, in all details, the very sensational
picture drawn by Mr. McMahon.
People always knew that O'Leary became entitled to a pension, though
how he acquired it was not so clear. Perhaps it is only fair to give
him the benefit of the version which his intimate friend, Francis
Plowden, placed on record eighty years ago.[525] His information was,
doubtless, derived from O'Leary himself; but O'Leary seems to have told
him no more than it was convenient to reveal:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account