Secret Service Under PittFitz-Patrick, William J. (William John)
History
Secret Service Under Pitt
Fitz-Patrick, William J. (William John)
Ireland -- History -- 1760-1820; Pitt, William, 1759-1806; Secret service -- Ireland
Understanding the Attorney-General is just with you, I take the
liberty of sending in a letter of Mr. Ball, but wish to speak on
other matters.
Sergeant Ball's letter is dated
Temple St., October 3, 1803.
I have looked into the Act of Parliament and considered in what
manner you should proceed in order to do away the effect of the
attainder thereby passed against you. Nothing short of an Act of
Parliament, reversing the former as far as it affects you, will be
sufficient to enable you to sue for your property in our courts
of justice. I think you mentioned that some other plan had been
suggested as sufficient. If you will let me know what it is, I will
give it the most attentive consideration.
How Marsden and the Attorney-General settled the difficulty, no
correspondence exists to show; but the London 'Courier' of December 5,
1803, most lucidly reveals the facts:--
On Friday last, Samuel Turner, Esq., barrister-at-law, was brought
to the bar of the Court of King's Bench, in custody of the keeper
of Kilmainham Prison, under a charge of attainder, passed in the
Irish Parliament, as one concerned in the Rebellion of the year
1798; but having shown that he was no way concerned therein, that
he had not been in the country for a year and seven months prior
to passing that Act--_i.e._ for thirteen months prior to the
rebellion--and therefore could not be the person alluded to, his
Majesty's Attorney-General confessed the same, and Mr. Turner was
discharged accordingly.[250]
The 'Dublin Evening Post' of the day states that Turner's arrest was
due simply to his indiscretion in visiting Ireland on business arising
from the death of his father.[251] But as the 'Post' in 1803 had been
subsidised by the Crown, this account was probably meant to mislead.
The Castle archives bulge with the brimful letters of its editor, H.
B. Code. Turner's committal to Kilmainham was only another act in the
great drama, one scene of which Mr. Froude has so powerfully put before
us. 'Samuel Turner, Esquire,' of imposing presence and indomitable
mien, a veteran in 'the cause,' the man who had challenged the
Commander-in-Chief, the envoy to France, the exile of Erin, the friend
of Lord Edward and Pamela, the disinherited by his father, the victim
of State persecution, now stood before his fellow-prisoners the 'Ecce
Homo' of martyrdom, commanding irresistibly their confidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account