Secret societies and subversive movementsWebster, Nesta Helen
History
Secret societies and subversive movements
Webster, Nesta Helen
Secret societies
It would therefore seem strange that a man so upright as Ramsay appears
to have been, who had moreover but recently been converted to the
Catholic Church, should have formed a friendship with the dissolute
Regent of France, unless there had been some bond between them. But here
we have a possible explanation--Templarism. Doubtless during Ramsay's
youth at Kilwinning many Templar traditions had come to his knowledge,
and if in France he found himself befriended by the Grand Master
himself, what wonder that he should have entered into an alliance which
resulted in his admission to an Order he had been accustomed to revere
and which, moreover, was represented to him as the _fons et origo_ of
the masonic brotherhood to which he also belonged? It is thus that we
find Ramsay in the very year that the Duc de Bourbon is said to have
been made Grand Master of the Temple artlessly writing to Cardinal
Fleury asking him to extend his protection to the society of Freemasons
in Paris and enclosing a copy of the speech which he was to deliver on
the following day, March 21, 1737. It is in this famous oration that for
the first time we find Freemasonry traced to the Crusades:
At the time of the Crusades in Palestine many princes, lords, and
citizens associated themselves, and vowed to restore the Temple of
the Christians in the Holy Land, and to employ themselves in
bringing back their architecture to its first institution. They
agreed upon several ancient signs and symbolic words drawn from the
well of religion in order to recognize themselves amongst the
heathens and Saracens. These signs and words were only communicated
to those who promised solemnly, and even sometimes at the foot of
the altar, never to reveal them. This sacred promise was therefore
not an execrable oath, as it has been called, but a respectable
bond to unite Christians of all nationalities into one
confraternity. Some time afterwards our Order formed an intimate
union with the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem. From that time our
Lodges took the name of Lodges of St. John.[366]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account