Secret societies and subversive movementsWebster, Nesta Helen
History
Secret societies and subversive movements
Webster, Nesta Helen
Secret societies
A further consequence of certain happenings of the war is to make
more firm our resolve to keep, as far as in us lies, Freemasonry
strictly away from participation in politics, either national or
international. This attitude of aloofness from necessarily
controversial affairs of State, on which Brethren can legitimately
and most properly differ, has ever been maintained by our Grand
Lodge since it was first convened in 1717. Because of this, it held
aloof from such international conferences as were summoned during
the war; and never more than now has the necessity for the
maintenance of this attitude been felt by British Freemasons....
For these reasons, the invitation to participate in the proposed
International Conference of Freemasons at Geneva cannot be
accepted. Such an assembly might be termed informal, but inevitably
it would be regarded as opening a door to compromise on those
things which this Grand Lodge has always held to be essentials.
Such a compromise English Freemasonry will never contemplate. On
these essentials we take the firm stand we have always done; we
cannot detract from full recognition of the Great Architect of the
Universe, and we shall continue to forbid the introduction of
political discussion into our Lodges.
British Masonry has thus taken a firm stand against the Grand Orient.
But it is regrettable that views so admirably expressed should be
confined to masonic correspondence and not made more apparent to the
world in general. On the Continent, outside masonic circles, the
difference between British Masonry and the Grand Orient variety is _not_
sufficiently known, and the reticence of leading British Masons on this
subject has not only played into the hands of the intractable
anti-Masons, who declare all Masonry to be harmful, but has strengthened
the position of the revolutionaries who use Masonry for a subversive
purpose. Thus in the Portuguese revolution of 1920 the Masons of that
country who were directing the movement sheltered themselves behind the
good name of England. "How can you accuse the lodges of being murder
clubs," they said to the people, "when Masonry is directed by England
and had King Edward for its Grand Master?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account