Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First TimeFreese, Jacob R.
History
Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First Time
Freese, Jacob R.
United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
Patrick Henry, in one of his outbursts of eloquence, said he "knew of no
way to judge of the future save by the past." Taking this as our guide,
let us inquire somewhat into the history of former republics, and see
if we cannot gather therefrom some probabilities as to the future of our
own, and some light by which to guide our own footsteps meanwhile. Our
plan and limited space will only permit us to take a bird's-eye view of
four--Athens, Sparta, Thebes, and Rome--but even from these alone we may
learn some useful lessons.
The republic of Athens came into existence immediately after the
voluntary death of King Codrus, about 1068 years before Christ. Codrus
having been made to believe, through an oracle, that if he sacrificed
his own life, his country would be victorious over the Heraclidæ, with
whom they were then engaged in war, disguised himself as a peasant, and,
purposely quarrelling with a soldier of the hostile army, procured the
death he wished. His sons, Medon and Nileus, disputed the succession
to the crown; and the Athenians, taking advantage of this dispute,
determined to set aside the crown altogether, and thenceforth have
a representative or republican form of government. Hence arose the
Athenian Republic. Though they abolished the title of king, out of the
high regard they had for Codrus, they appointed his son Medon chief
magistrate for life, and even made the office hereditary, so that for
three hundred and thirty-one years thereafter the chief magistrate
continued in that family. They then abolished the perpetual archonship,
and made the tenure of the office ten years. This term they reduced
erelong to one year, and, instead of one archon or chief magistrate,
appointed nine, with equal authority. Meanwhile their government became
so purely democratic as to become utterly despotic, and the tyranny of
the mob was found to be more oppressive than the restraints of a
single ruler. Then followed the laws of Draco, which, because of
their severity, were said to have been "written in blood." He made
no distinction of offences, but punished all equally with death. He
weakened the authority of the Areopagus, and instituted a new tribunal,
in which judges were given almost unlimited power, and virtually made
brutes. The severity of his laws defeated their own object.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account