Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First TimeFreese, Jacob R.
History
Secrets of the Late Rebellion, Now Revealed for the First Time
Freese, Jacob R.
United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
Mr. A. and his friends were very indignant at the sentence; said it
should never be paid; that he would rot in the jail first; that they
would appeal to General McClellan, to the President, to the Cabinet, to
Congress; but to all such threats the Judge only replied, when they came
to his ears, "He shall have all the opportunities he wants for appeal,
but until the fine is paid, or the judgment set aside by a higher
authority, he must remain in jail." That afternoon and evening every
possible effort was made with General Montgomery and with Judge Freese
to have him released on bail, but without avail. Next day, when the
court opened, a friend of Mr. A. was present with five hundred dollars
in silver, which he paid down, and thereupon received an order from the
Judge for Mr. A.'s release from jail. That money, as all other received
by the court for fines, and not used for feeding the prisoners and
other incidental court expenses, was deposited with the United States
Treasurer, at Washington, to await such further action as might be had
in this or in any other case.
In pursuance of their threats, Mr. A. and his friends at once went
to work to have the fine refunded, and finally, after several months'
effort, succeeded in getting General McClellan to issue an order on
General Montgomery for the refunding of the money. This was done by an
order on the United States Treasurer for the five hundred dollars.
Mr. A. got his money back, but neither he nor any other secessionist of
Alexandria ever again made an assault, with threat to kill, upon a
Union man; nor did any Union man make a like assault or threat upon a
secessionist. And, better still, it had the effect to convince every
secessionist that Judge Freese's court was no respecter of persons; that
while it punished such of the poor as violated the law, it was no less
ready to punish the rich; and that a Union man in Alexandria would be
protected by the court with as much vigilance as one could possibly be
in New York or Philadelphia. The refunding of the fine, however, proved
that General McClellan and his advisers, while pretending great love for
the Union, were largely in sympathy with the secessionists, and would,
so far as they could, undo anything the Provost-Court might do in
punishing rebels and protecting loyal men. General Montgomery and Judge
Freese, being convinced that such would thenceforth be the policy of
General McClellan and his advisers, tried thereafter to so shape the
proceedings of the court that General McClellan should know as little
about it, and have as little to do with it, as possible--believing (as
afterwards proved true) that he would not only thwart its proceedings,
but really abolish the court altogether, whenever he could see that he
could do so without calling down upon himself and political associates
condemnation from the administration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account