Selected papers on hysteria and other psychoneurosesFreud, Sigmund
Science
Selected papers on hysteria and other psychoneuroses
Freud, Sigmund
Hysteria; Neuroses; Psychoanalysis
This hypothesis, which also underlies our theory of “ab-reaction”
(“Preliminary Communication”), can be used in the same sense as the
physicist uses the assumption of the current of electric fluid. It is
preliminarily justified through its usefulness in the comprehension and
elucidation of diverse psychic states.
CHAPTER VI.
ON THE RIGHT TO SEPARATE FROM NEURASTHENIA A DEFINITE SYMPTOM-COMPLEX AS
“ANXIETY NEUROSIS”
(ANGSTNEUROSE).
It is difficult to assert anything of general validity concerning
neurasthenia as long as this term is allowed to express all that for
which Beard used it. I believe that neuropathology can only gain by an
attempt to separate from the actual neurosis all those neurotic
disturbances the symptoms of which are on the one hand more firmly
connected among themselves than to the typical neurasthenic symptoms,
such as headache, spinal irritation, dyspepsia with flatulence and
constipation, and which on the other hand show essential differences
from the typical neurasthenic neurosis in their etiology and mechanism.
If we accept this plan we will soon gain quite a uniform picture of
neurasthenia. We will soon be able to differentiate—sharper than we have
hitherto succeeded—from the real neurasthenia the different
pseudoneurasthenias, such as the organically determined nasal reflex
neurosis, the neurotic disturbances of cachexias and arteriosclerosis,
the early stages of progressive paralysis, and of some psychoses.
Furthermore, following the proposition of Moebius, some status nervosi
of hereditary degenerates will be set aside and we will also find
reasons for ascribing some of the neuroses which are now called
neurasthenia to melancholia, especially those of an intermittent or
periodic nature. But we force the way into the most marked changes if we
decide to separate from neurasthenia that symptom-complex which I shall
hereafter describe and which especially fulfills the conditions
formulated above. The symptoms of this complex are clinically more
related to one another than to the real neurasthenic symptoms, that is,
they frequently appear together and substitute one another in the course
of the disease, and both the etiology as well as the mechanism of this
neurosis differs basically from the etiology and the mechanism of the
real neurasthenia which remains after such a separation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account