I, on my side, might justly censure those erudite Greek writers, who,
living in times of such stirring actions as by comparison reduce to
insignificance the wars of antiquity, yet sit in judgement on these
current events and revile those who make them their special
study—authors whose principles they lack, even if they have the
advantage of them in literary skill. They take as their themes the
Assyrian and Median empires, as if the narratives of the ancient
historians were inadequate, although these modern writers are their
inferiors no less in literary power than in judgement. The ancient
historians set themselves severally to write the history of their own
times, a task in which their connexion with the events added lucidity to
their record; while mendacity brought an author into disgrace with
readers who knew the facts.
The truth is that the work of committing to writing events which have
not[234] previously been recorded and of commending to posterity the
history of one’s own time is one which merits praise and acknowledgment.
The industrious writer is not one who merely remodels the scheme and
arrangement of another’s work, but one who, besides having fresh
materials, gives the body of his history a framework of his own.
For myself, at the cost of much money and severe labour, I, a foreigner,
present to Greeks and Romans this memorial of great achievements. As for
the native (Greek) writers, where personal profit or a lawsuit is
concerned, their mouths are at once agape and their tongues loosed; but
in the matter of history, where veracity and laborious collection of the
facts are essential, they are mute, leaving to inferior and ill-informed
writers the task of describing the exploits of rulers. Let me[235] at
least hold historical truth in honour, since by the Greeks it is
disregarded....—_B.J._ I. 1-5 (1-16).
Footnote 229:
Many MSS add “by birth a Hebrew.”
Footnote 230:
Aramaic. The Greek, which bears no marks of translation, must, in all
probability, have been practically a new work.
Footnote 231:
Lit. “the upper barbarians.”
Footnote 232:
In the upper Tigris region.
Footnote 233:
Such, or “giving the rein to personal feeling in the speeches
(λόγοι),” I take to be the meaning. Traill, “introducing into the
detail reflections on the events”; Whiston, “only I shall suit my
language to my feelings as to the affairs I describe.”
Footnote 234:
The negative is omitted by most MSS.
Footnote 235:
Lit. “us.”
(39) Seeds of the War sown under the last of the Procurators. Rise of
the Sicarii
Felix
[Sidenote: A.D. 52-60]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account