the cry of the angel Gabriel.—S. (B., Z., &c.)
[340] Some say these two were John and Paul; but others name different
persons.—S.
[341] Simon Peter.
[342] His tomb is still shown near Antioch, and is much visited by the
Moḥammadans.—S.
[343] Also some said he was taken up into heaven; and others, that his
manhood only suffered, and that his godhead ascended into heaven.—S.
(B.)
[344] Some, referring the relative _his_ to the first antecedent, take
the meaning to be that no Jew or Christian shall die before he
believes in Jesus; for they say that when one of either of those
religions is ready to breathe his last, and sees the angel of death
before him, he shall then believe in that prophet as he ought, though
his faith will not then be of any avail. According to a tradition of
El-Hajjáj, when a Jew is expiring the angels will strike him on the
back and face, and say to him, ‘O thou enemy of God, Jesus was sent as
a prophet unto thee, and thou didst not believe on him;’ to which he
will answer, ‘I now believe him to be the servant of God:’ and to a
dying Christian they will say, ‘Jesus was sent as a prophet unto thee,
and thou hast imagined him to be God, or the son of God;’ whereupon he
will believe him to be the servant of God only and His
apostle.—Others, taking the above-mentioned relative to refer to
Jesus, suppose the intent of the passage to be that all Jews and
Christians in general [the dead being raised to life in their graves]
shall have a right faith in that prophet before his death, that is,
when he descends from heaven and returns into the world, where he is
to kill Antichrist and to establish the Moḥammadan religion and a most
perfect tranquillity and security on earth [where he will remain forty
years, and then die.—Others again suppose that the words ‘believe in
him’ signify ‘believe in God.’]—S. (B., Z., Jelál, &c.)
[345] It is a dispute among the Moḥammadans whether Christ actually
died or not before his assumption.—S. (B.)
[346] Some, however, are of opinion it [this passage] might have been
revealed in answer to certain idolaters, who said that the Christians,
who received the Scriptures, worshipped Jesus, supposing him to be the
son of God; whereas the angels were more worthy of that honour than
he.—S. (B.)
[347] As easily as We produced Jesus without a father [B.]. The intent
of the words is to show how just and reasonable it is to think that
the angels should bear the relation of children to men rather than to
God, they being His creatures as well as men, and equally in His
power.—S.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account