Sermons by the Fathers of the Congregation of St. Paul the Apostle, Volume VI.Paulist Fathers
Religion
Sermons by the Fathers of the Congregation of St. Paul the Apostle, Volume VI.
Paulist Fathers
Catholic Church -- Sermons; Sermons, American -- 19th century
Tertullian, about the end of the second century, exclaims: "From
no other cause have heresies arisen and schisms sprung up, except
from a want of obedience to the priest of God, and because they
do not remember that there is one judge for the time being in the
Church, in the place of Christ."
{225}
The great and general Council of Nice, A.D. 325, in one of its
canons says: "The Roman Church has always held the Primacy." The
Council of Sardica, in a letter to the Pope, says: "This seems
excellent and most suitable, that the priests of the Lord from
the respective provinces should report to the Head," __i.e.__,
to the See of the Apostle Peter. In the fifth century, all the
Bishops of the province of Aries, in France, in a letter to Pope
Leo, say: "The Holy Roman Church, through the most blessed Peter,
Prince of the Apostles, has the principality above all the
churches of the world." The grand Council of Chalcedon, where six
hundred Bishops were present, mostly from the East, and out of
the limits of the particular patriarchate of Rome, when the
letter of the same Pope Leo was read, defining the faith of two
distinct natures, divine and human, in Christ, exclaimed with one
voice, "Peter has spoken by the mouth of Leo." At the beginning
of the sixth century, the Bishop of Patara said to the Emperor
Justinian: "There may be many sovereigns on the earth; but there
is one Pope over all the churches of the universe." Not only
Christian bishops and councils speak in this way of the Roman
See, but emperors, and even pagans, use the same language.
{226}
In the year 268, when Paul, Patriarch of Antioch, was condemned
of heresy by a council, the pagan Emperor Aurelian directed that
the Church of Antioch "should be delivered up to those whom the
Bishops of Italy and the Bishop of Rome should appoint." Ammianus
Marcellinus, a pagan writer of the fourth century, affirms that
"the Bishops of the Eternal City enjoy a greater authority." The
Christian Emperor Valentinian, in a decree of the year 455, says:
"The merit of the blessed Peter, who is the Prince of priestly
order, and the dignity of the Roman city, the authority also of
the Synod, strengthened the Primacy of the Apostolic See." These
testimonies extend from the sixth back to the second century,
when the disciples of the Apostles still lived. They are not
merely the testimonies of the Bishops of Rome themselves, or of
those who lived in the vicinity and under the immediate influence
of Rome, but they are collected from Italy, France, Africa, and
the whole Eastern Church, where those great Patriarchs flourished
who afterwards renounced their subjection to Rome. Thus, it is
evident, from these and a host of similar testimonies, that,
during the first six centuries, the Bishops of Rome claimed to
exercise the supremacy in the place of Peter, and that this claim
was universally acknowledged.
{227}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account