Seventeen Talks on the Banking Question: Between Uncle Sam and Mr. Farmer, Mr. Banker, Mr. Lawyer, Mr. Laboringman, Mr. Merchant, Mr. ManufacturerFowler, Charles N. (Charles Newell)
History
Seventeen Talks on the Banking Question: Between Uncle Sam and Mr. Farmer, Mr. Banker, Mr. Lawyer, Mr. Laboringman, Mr. Merchant, Mr. Manufacturer
Fowler, Charles N. (Charles Newell)
Banks and banking -- United States; Currency question -- United States
_Ninth_: Our United States Notes again demonstrated the fact that
Government credit should never be used as a basis of legal tender
money. Tonight we are to discuss Reserves, which are the protection or
guarantee of credits granted or debts created.
Is that a correct definition of reserves?
MR. BANKER: Uncle Sam, I don't think anyone could give a better one.
UNCLE SAM: By way of encouragement to you men, before you begin to
discuss the subject of reserves, I want to gamble the prophecy that if
you will work out some method or plan that will make it possible for
the banker to pay all his deposits on demand, and at the same time will
enable him to continue to use practically all of them in profitable
employment, I will guarantee you now the support of every banker for
your plan, when you've completed it.
MR. MERCHANT: I don't think you assume any risk in that guarantee,
Uncle Sam.
MR. LABORINGMAN: Uncle Sam, you say that you will guarantee that every
banker will support it. That insurance policy won't be any risk at all.
Won't cost you a cent. I tell you now that if you can work out a plan
that will amount to an absolute guarantee of deposits, as a matter of
administration, I will guarantee the support of every depositor in the
country, and if I could prove it to their satisfaction, every depositor
would gladly pay me from one-quarter to one-half per cent on his
deposit. Do you know what I would get at that rate, say at one-quarter
per cent, only $42,000,000 every year; for our deposits you say are now
seventeen billion ($17,000,000,000).
Have you men ever looked up bank failures in the United States? Here is
something I stumbled upon yesterday.
Our country is so extensive and our banks are so numerous that
nothing whatever is thought in one part of a bank failure in another
part. Especially is this so since they occur so frequently. Like the
operation of the guillotine during the French Revolution and the
automobile manslaughter of today, bank failures in the United States
have become mere passing occurrences. Is this putting it too strongly?
Let us see.
Since the establishment of the national system in 1864, 518 national
banks have failed, with liabilities reaching $244,000,000. The direct
losses of the failed banks amount to $38,000,000.
Two thousand and fourteen state and private banks have failed since
1864, with liabilities amounting to $825,000,000, and probable losses
of $200,000,000.
The total liability of all banks, national, state and private, failing
since 1864 is $1,069,000,000. Their aggregate is 2,532 banks. In other
words, fifty-six banks have failed every year on an average, or nearly
five banks every month, and more than one bank every week.
Three hundred and fifty-one national banks have failed since 1890, with
liabilities aggregating $174,000,000.
One thousand four hundred and six state and private banks have failed
since 1890, with liabilities aggregating $694,000,000.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account