Sec. 51. _Important Steps in the Sex-education Movement in America_ May 23, 1904. Dr. Prince Morrow's plea for the organization of a society of sanitary and moral prophylaxis, read before the Medical Society of the County of New York. February 9, 1905. Organization meeting of the American Society of Sanitary and Moral Prophylaxis, in New York. March, 1906. Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Social Diseases organized. October, 1906. Chicago Society of Social Hygiene organized. December, 1907. Portland (Ore.) Social Hygiene Society organized. October, 1908. Spokane Society of Social and Moral Prophylaxis organized. June, 1910. American Federation for Sex-Hygiene organized. 1911. Oregon Social Hygiene Society organized. July 20, 1912. Resolution of the National Education Association favoring training of teachers with the view, ultimately, of sex-instruction in schools. September 23-28, 1912. Meeting of subsection on sex-hygiene, Fifteenth International Congress on Hygiene and Demography. Washington, D.C. February, 1912. Organization of American Vigilance Association. October, 1913. Merging of the American Federation for Sex-Hygiene and the American Vigilance Association into the new American Social Hygiene Association. 1913. Organization of Pacific Coast Federation for Sex-Hygiene, changed to Pacific Coast Social Hygiene Association in June, 1914. July, 1914. The National Education Association, at Minneapolis, adopted the following resolutions in line with the latest principles of the Society of Sanitary and Moral Prophylaxis and the American Social Hygiene Association: "The Association, re-affirming its belief in the constructive value of education in sex-hygiene, directs attention to the grave dangers, ethical and social, arising out of a sex consciousness stimulated by undue emphasis upon sex problems and relations. The situation is so serious as to render neglect hazardous. The Association urges upon all parents the obvious duty of parental care and instruction in such matters and directs attention to the mistake of leaving such problems exclusively to the school. The Association believes that sex-hygiene should be approached in the public schools conservatively under the direction of persons qualified by scientific training and teaching experience in order to assure a safe moral point of view. The Association, therefore, recommends that institutions preparing teachers give attention to such subjects as would qualify for instruction in the general field of morals as well as in the particular field of sex-hygiene." Sec. 52. _The Future of the Larger Sex-education_ [Sidenote: Public has lost interest in sensationalism.]